Cargando…
A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension
BACKGROUND: Bibliographic databases are the primary resource for identifying systematic reviews of health care interventions. Reliable retrieval of systematic reviews depends on the scope of indexing used by database providers. Therefore, searching one database may be insufficient, but it is unclear...
Autores principales: | Rathbone, John, Carter, Matt, Hoffmann, Tammy, Glasziou, Paul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26862061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module
por: Rathbone, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers
por: Rathbone, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis
por: Ellegaard, Ole, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Multidisciplinary Bibliographic Databases
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Specialist Bibliographic Databases
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2016)