Cargando…

Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

BACKGROUND: Phage-encoded serine integrases, such as ϕC31 integrase, are widely used for genome engineering but have not been optimized for use in Saccharomyces cerevisiae although this organism is a widely used organism in biotechnology. RESULTS: The activities of derivatives of fourteen serine int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Zhengyao, Brown, William R. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26860416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0241-5
_version_ 1782415135101419520
author Xu, Zhengyao
Brown, William R. A.
author_facet Xu, Zhengyao
Brown, William R. A.
author_sort Xu, Zhengyao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phage-encoded serine integrases, such as ϕC31 integrase, are widely used for genome engineering but have not been optimized for use in Saccharomyces cerevisiae although this organism is a widely used organism in biotechnology. RESULTS: The activities of derivatives of fourteen serine integrases that either possess or lack a nuclear localization signal were compared using a standardized recombinase mediated cassette exchange reaction. The relative activities of these integrases in S. cerevisiae and in mammalian cells suggested that the major determinant of the activity of an integrase is the enzyme itself and not the cell in which it is working. We used an inducible promoter to show that six integrases were toxic as judged by their effects upon the proliferative ability of transformed yeast. We show that in general the active phage-encoded serine integrases were an order of magnitude more efficient in promoting genome integration reactions than a simple homologous recombination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study allow us to identify the integrases of the phage ϕBT1, TP901 ~ nls, R4, Bxb1, MR11, A118, ϕK38, ϕC31 ~ nls, Wβ and SPBC ~ nls as active in S. cerevisiae and indicate that vertebrate cells are more restricted than yeast in terms of which integrases are active. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12896-016-0241-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4748531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47485312016-02-11 Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Xu, Zhengyao Brown, William R. A. BMC Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Phage-encoded serine integrases, such as ϕC31 integrase, are widely used for genome engineering but have not been optimized for use in Saccharomyces cerevisiae although this organism is a widely used organism in biotechnology. RESULTS: The activities of derivatives of fourteen serine integrases that either possess or lack a nuclear localization signal were compared using a standardized recombinase mediated cassette exchange reaction. The relative activities of these integrases in S. cerevisiae and in mammalian cells suggested that the major determinant of the activity of an integrase is the enzyme itself and not the cell in which it is working. We used an inducible promoter to show that six integrases were toxic as judged by their effects upon the proliferative ability of transformed yeast. We show that in general the active phage-encoded serine integrases were an order of magnitude more efficient in promoting genome integration reactions than a simple homologous recombination. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study allow us to identify the integrases of the phage ϕBT1, TP901 ~ nls, R4, Bxb1, MR11, A118, ϕK38, ϕC31 ~ nls, Wβ and SPBC ~ nls as active in S. cerevisiae and indicate that vertebrate cells are more restricted than yeast in terms of which integrases are active. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12896-016-0241-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4748531/ /pubmed/26860416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0241-5 Text en © Xu and Brown. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Zhengyao
Brown, William R. A.
Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_fullStr Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short Comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_sort comparison and optimization of ten phage encoded serine integrases for genome engineering in saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26860416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0241-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhengyao comparisonandoptimizationoftenphageencodedserineintegrasesforgenomeengineeringinsaccharomycescerevisiae
AT brownwilliamra comparisonandoptimizationoftenphageencodedserineintegrasesforgenomeengineeringinsaccharomycescerevisiae