Cargando…

Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system

BACKGROUND: The ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), called the reverse shock index (RSI), is used to evaluate the hemodynamic stability of trauma patients. To minimize undertriage in emergency departments (EDs), we evaluated whether RSI < 1 (i.e., SBP lower than HR) could b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chuang, Jung-Fang, Rau, Cheng-Shyuan, Wu, Shao-Chun, Liu, Hang-Tsung, Hsu, Shiun-Yuan, Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun, Chen, Yi-Chun, Hsieh, Ching-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0208-5
_version_ 1782415150444183552
author Chuang, Jung-Fang
Rau, Cheng-Shyuan
Wu, Shao-Chun
Liu, Hang-Tsung
Hsu, Shiun-Yuan
Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun
Chen, Yi-Chun
Hsieh, Ching-Hua
author_facet Chuang, Jung-Fang
Rau, Cheng-Shyuan
Wu, Shao-Chun
Liu, Hang-Tsung
Hsu, Shiun-Yuan
Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun
Chen, Yi-Chun
Hsieh, Ching-Hua
author_sort Chuang, Jung-Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), called the reverse shock index (RSI), is used to evaluate the hemodynamic stability of trauma patients. To minimize undertriage in emergency departments (EDs), we evaluated whether RSI < 1 (i.e., SBP lower than HR) could be used as an additional variable to identify patients at high risk for more severe injury within a level category of the five-level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scales (TTAS) system. METHODS: Data obtained from the Trauma Registry System, including triage level according to the TTAS system, were retrospectively reviewed for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2013 in a Level I trauma center. In our study, the primary outcomes were injury severity as measured using different scoring systems, including the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), abbreviated injury scale scores, and the injury severity score (ISS), and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 10,814 trauma patients, 348 patients (3.2 %) had RSI < 1, whereas 10,466 (96.8 %) had RSI ≥ 1. Those with RSI < 1 had greater injury severity, a higher incidence of commonly associated injuries, lower GCS scores, greater deterioration of vital signs, and a higher incidence of procedures those with RSI ≥ 1. Patients with RSI < 1 also worse outcomes including hospital and ICU LOS, a greater frequency of ICU admission, and higher in-hospital mortality. Although the five-level TTAS system provides good prioritization of patients with major trauma, using the additional criterion of RSI < 1 could identify the patients at higher risk within the same triage level (I–III). DISCUSSION: The alert of a trauma patient’s SBP being lower than his/her HR (RSI < 1) without the requirement of any additional equipment makes the concept of RSI particularly valuable in crowded EDs for identifying high-risk patients. RSI < 1 may serve as a principle trigger for action in the ED to alert trauma surgeons to the need for early intervention and timely preparation upon patient arrival particularly for those patients triaged in levels II and III of the TTAS system. CONCLUSIONS: RSI < 1 upon arrival at an ED is an alarming sign of an associated worse outcome. Within the same triage level from level I to level III, patients with RSI < 1 had worse outcomes than those with RSI ≥ 1. The inclusion of RSI in the TTAS system may help to identify patients with more serious injuries who need an upgraded management level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4748603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47486032016-02-11 Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system Chuang, Jung-Fang Rau, Cheng-Shyuan Wu, Shao-Chun Liu, Hang-Tsung Hsu, Shiun-Yuan Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun Chen, Yi-Chun Hsieh, Ching-Hua Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), called the reverse shock index (RSI), is used to evaluate the hemodynamic stability of trauma patients. To minimize undertriage in emergency departments (EDs), we evaluated whether RSI < 1 (i.e., SBP lower than HR) could be used as an additional variable to identify patients at high risk for more severe injury within a level category of the five-level Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scales (TTAS) system. METHODS: Data obtained from the Trauma Registry System, including triage level according to the TTAS system, were retrospectively reviewed for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2013 in a Level I trauma center. In our study, the primary outcomes were injury severity as measured using different scoring systems, including the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), abbreviated injury scale scores, and the injury severity score (ISS), and in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Of 10,814 trauma patients, 348 patients (3.2 %) had RSI < 1, whereas 10,466 (96.8 %) had RSI ≥ 1. Those with RSI < 1 had greater injury severity, a higher incidence of commonly associated injuries, lower GCS scores, greater deterioration of vital signs, and a higher incidence of procedures those with RSI ≥ 1. Patients with RSI < 1 also worse outcomes including hospital and ICU LOS, a greater frequency of ICU admission, and higher in-hospital mortality. Although the five-level TTAS system provides good prioritization of patients with major trauma, using the additional criterion of RSI < 1 could identify the patients at higher risk within the same triage level (I–III). DISCUSSION: The alert of a trauma patient’s SBP being lower than his/her HR (RSI < 1) without the requirement of any additional equipment makes the concept of RSI particularly valuable in crowded EDs for identifying high-risk patients. RSI < 1 may serve as a principle trigger for action in the ED to alert trauma surgeons to the need for early intervention and timely preparation upon patient arrival particularly for those patients triaged in levels II and III of the TTAS system. CONCLUSIONS: RSI < 1 upon arrival at an ED is an alarming sign of an associated worse outcome. Within the same triage level from level I to level III, patients with RSI < 1 had worse outcomes than those with RSI ≥ 1. The inclusion of RSI in the TTAS system may help to identify patients with more serious injuries who need an upgraded management level. BioMed Central 2016-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4748603/ /pubmed/26861172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0208-5 Text en © Chuang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chuang, Jung-Fang
Rau, Cheng-Shyuan
Wu, Shao-Chun
Liu, Hang-Tsung
Hsu, Shiun-Yuan
Hsieh, Hsiao-Yun
Chen, Yi-Chun
Hsieh, Ching-Hua
Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title_full Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title_fullStr Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title_full_unstemmed Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title_short Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
title_sort use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0208-5
work_keys_str_mv AT chuangjungfang useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT rauchengshyuan useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT wushaochun useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT liuhangtsung useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT hsushiunyuan useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT hsiehhsiaoyun useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT chenyichun useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem
AT hsiehchinghua useofthereverseshockindexforidentifyinghighriskpatientsinafiveleveltriagesystem