Cargando…
The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare the performance between single-gene and multiple-gene tests. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using keywords colorectal cancers, stool/fecal, sensitivi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002129 |
_version_ | 1782415190079307776 |
---|---|
author | Zhai, Rong-Lin Xu, Fei Zhang, Pei Zhang, Wan-Li Wang, Hui Wang, Ji-Liang Cai, Kai-Lin Long, Yue-Ping Lu, Xiao-Ming Tao, Kai-Xiong Wang, Guo-Bin |
author_facet | Zhai, Rong-Lin Xu, Fei Zhang, Pei Zhang, Wan-Li Wang, Hui Wang, Ji-Liang Cai, Kai-Lin Long, Yue-Ping Lu, Xiao-Ming Tao, Kai-Xiong Wang, Guo-Bin |
author_sort | Zhai, Rong-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare the performance between single-gene and multiple-gene tests. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using keywords colorectal cancers, stool/fecal, sensitivity, specificity, DNA, and screening. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessments, and performance bias were performed for the included studies. Fifty-three studies were included in the analysis with a total sample size of 7524 patients. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to the genes being analyzed for fecal genetic biomarkers of CRC, as well as the laboratory methods being used for each assay. The sensitivity of the different assays ranged from 2% to 100% and the specificity ranged from 81% to 100%. The meta-analysis found that the pooled sensitivities for single- and multigene assays were 48.0% and 77.8%, respectively, while the pooled specificities were 97.0% and 92.7%. Receiver operator curves and diagnostic odds ratios showed no significant difference between both tests with regard to sensitivity or specificity. This meta-analysis revealed that using assays that evaluated multiple genes compared with single-gene assays did not increase the sensitivity or specificity of stool DNA testing in detecting CRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4748866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47488662016-04-01 The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhai, Rong-Lin Xu, Fei Zhang, Pei Zhang, Wan-Li Wang, Hui Wang, Ji-Liang Cai, Kai-Lin Long, Yue-Ping Lu, Xiao-Ming Tao, Kai-Xiong Wang, Guo-Bin Medicine (Baltimore) 4100 This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare the performance between single-gene and multiple-gene tests. MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE databases were searched using keywords colorectal cancers, stool/fecal, sensitivity, specificity, DNA, and screening. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessments, and performance bias were performed for the included studies. Fifty-three studies were included in the analysis with a total sample size of 7524 patients. The studies were heterogeneous with regard to the genes being analyzed for fecal genetic biomarkers of CRC, as well as the laboratory methods being used for each assay. The sensitivity of the different assays ranged from 2% to 100% and the specificity ranged from 81% to 100%. The meta-analysis found that the pooled sensitivities for single- and multigene assays were 48.0% and 77.8%, respectively, while the pooled specificities were 97.0% and 92.7%. Receiver operator curves and diagnostic odds ratios showed no significant difference between both tests with regard to sensitivity or specificity. This meta-analysis revealed that using assays that evaluated multiple genes compared with single-gene assays did not increase the sensitivity or specificity of stool DNA testing in detecting CRC. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4748866/ /pubmed/26844449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002129 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4100 Zhai, Rong-Lin Xu, Fei Zhang, Pei Zhang, Wan-Li Wang, Hui Wang, Ji-Liang Cai, Kai-Lin Long, Yue-Ping Lu, Xiao-Ming Tao, Kai-Xiong Wang, Guo-Bin The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Diagnostic Performance of Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of stool dna testing for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 4100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaironglin thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xufei thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangpei thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwanli thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghui thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangjiliang thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caikailin thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT longyueping thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luxiaoming thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taokaixiong thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangguobin thediagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaironglin diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xufei diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangpei diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangwanli diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanghui diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangjiliang diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caikailin diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT longyueping diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luxiaoming diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT taokaixiong diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangguobin diagnosticperformanceofstooldnatestingforcolorectalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |