Cargando…

Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations

Extensive interdisciplinary literatures have built on the seminal spatial dilemmas model, which depicts the evolution of cooperation on regular lattices, with strategies propagating locally by relative fitness. In this model agents may cooperate with neighbors, paying an individual cost to enhance t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitts, James A., Leal, Diego F., Felps, Will, Jones, Thomas M., Berman, Shawn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26863540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147264
_version_ 1782415231924830208
author Kitts, James A.
Leal, Diego F.
Felps, Will
Jones, Thomas M.
Berman, Shawn L.
author_facet Kitts, James A.
Leal, Diego F.
Felps, Will
Jones, Thomas M.
Berman, Shawn L.
author_sort Kitts, James A.
collection PubMed
description Extensive interdisciplinary literatures have built on the seminal spatial dilemmas model, which depicts the evolution of cooperation on regular lattices, with strategies propagating locally by relative fitness. In this model agents may cooperate with neighbors, paying an individual cost to enhance their collective welfare, or they may exploit cooperative neighbors and diminish collective welfare. Recent research has extended the model in numerous ways, incorporating behavioral noise, implementing other network topologies or adaptive networks, and employing alternative dynamics of replication. Although the underlying dilemma arises from two distinct dimensions—the gains for exploiting cooperative partners (Greed) and the cost of cooperating with exploitative partners (Fear)–most work following from the spatial dilemmas model has argued or assumed that the dilemma can be represented with a single parameter: This research has typically examined Greed or Fear in isolation, or a composite such as the K-index of Cooperation or the ratio of the benefit to cost of cooperation. We challenge this claim on theoretical grounds—showing that embedding interaction in networks generally leads Greed and Fear to have divergent, interactive, and highly nonlinear effects on cooperation at the macro level, even when individuals respond identically to Greed and Fear. Using computational experiments, we characterize both dynamic local behavior and long run outcomes across regions of this space. We also simulate interventions to investigate changes of Greed and Fear over time, showing how model behavior changes asymmetrically as boundaries in payoff space are crossed, leading some interventions to have irreversible effects on cooperation. We then replicate our experiments on inter-organizational network data derived from links through shared directors among 2,400 large US corporations, thus demonstrating our findings for Greed and Fear on a naturally-occurring network. In closing, we discuss implications of our main findings regarding Greed and Fear for the problem of cooperation on inter-organizational networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4749156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47491562016-02-26 Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations Kitts, James A. Leal, Diego F. Felps, Will Jones, Thomas M. Berman, Shawn L. PLoS One Research Article Extensive interdisciplinary literatures have built on the seminal spatial dilemmas model, which depicts the evolution of cooperation on regular lattices, with strategies propagating locally by relative fitness. In this model agents may cooperate with neighbors, paying an individual cost to enhance their collective welfare, or they may exploit cooperative neighbors and diminish collective welfare. Recent research has extended the model in numerous ways, incorporating behavioral noise, implementing other network topologies or adaptive networks, and employing alternative dynamics of replication. Although the underlying dilemma arises from two distinct dimensions—the gains for exploiting cooperative partners (Greed) and the cost of cooperating with exploitative partners (Fear)–most work following from the spatial dilemmas model has argued or assumed that the dilemma can be represented with a single parameter: This research has typically examined Greed or Fear in isolation, or a composite such as the K-index of Cooperation or the ratio of the benefit to cost of cooperation. We challenge this claim on theoretical grounds—showing that embedding interaction in networks generally leads Greed and Fear to have divergent, interactive, and highly nonlinear effects on cooperation at the macro level, even when individuals respond identically to Greed and Fear. Using computational experiments, we characterize both dynamic local behavior and long run outcomes across regions of this space. We also simulate interventions to investigate changes of Greed and Fear over time, showing how model behavior changes asymmetrically as boundaries in payoff space are crossed, leading some interventions to have irreversible effects on cooperation. We then replicate our experiments on inter-organizational network data derived from links through shared directors among 2,400 large US corporations, thus demonstrating our findings for Greed and Fear on a naturally-occurring network. In closing, we discuss implications of our main findings regarding Greed and Fear for the problem of cooperation on inter-organizational networks. Public Library of Science 2016-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4749156/ /pubmed/26863540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147264 Text en © 2016 Kitts et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kitts, James A.
Leal, Diego F.
Felps, Will
Jones, Thomas M.
Berman, Shawn L.
Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title_full Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title_fullStr Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title_full_unstemmed Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title_short Greed and Fear in Network Reciprocity: Implications for Cooperation among Organizations
title_sort greed and fear in network reciprocity: implications for cooperation among organizations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26863540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147264
work_keys_str_mv AT kittsjamesa greedandfearinnetworkreciprocityimplicationsforcooperationamongorganizations
AT lealdiegof greedandfearinnetworkreciprocityimplicationsforcooperationamongorganizations
AT felpswill greedandfearinnetworkreciprocityimplicationsforcooperationamongorganizations
AT jonesthomasm greedandfearinnetworkreciprocityimplicationsforcooperationamongorganizations
AT bermanshawnl greedandfearinnetworkreciprocityimplicationsforcooperationamongorganizations