Cargando…
Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli
Many believe that humans can ‘perceive unconsciously’ – that for weak stimuli, briefly presented and masked, above-chance discrimination is possible without awareness. Interestingly, an online survey reveals that most experts in the field recognize the lack of convincing evidence for this phenomenon...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433023 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651 |
_version_ | 1782415286699294720 |
---|---|
author | Peters, Megan A K Lau, Hakwan |
author_facet | Peters, Megan A K Lau, Hakwan |
author_sort | Peters, Megan A K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many believe that humans can ‘perceive unconsciously’ – that for weak stimuli, briefly presented and masked, above-chance discrimination is possible without awareness. Interestingly, an online survey reveals that most experts in the field recognize the lack of convincing evidence for this phenomenon, and yet they persist in this belief. Using a recently developed bias-free experimental procedure for measuring subjective introspection (confidence), we found no evidence for unconscious perception; participants’ behavior matched that of a Bayesian ideal observer, even though the stimuli were visually masked. This surprising finding suggests that the thresholds for subjective awareness and objective discrimination are effectively the same: if objective task performance is above chance, there is likely conscious experience. These findings shed new light on decades-old methodological issues regarding what it takes to consider a neurobiological or behavioral effect to be 'unconscious,' and provide a platform for rigorously investigating unconscious perception in future studies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651.001 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4749556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47495562016-02-12 Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli Peters, Megan A K Lau, Hakwan eLife Neuroscience Many believe that humans can ‘perceive unconsciously’ – that for weak stimuli, briefly presented and masked, above-chance discrimination is possible without awareness. Interestingly, an online survey reveals that most experts in the field recognize the lack of convincing evidence for this phenomenon, and yet they persist in this belief. Using a recently developed bias-free experimental procedure for measuring subjective introspection (confidence), we found no evidence for unconscious perception; participants’ behavior matched that of a Bayesian ideal observer, even though the stimuli were visually masked. This surprising finding suggests that the thresholds for subjective awareness and objective discrimination are effectively the same: if objective task performance is above chance, there is likely conscious experience. These findings shed new light on decades-old methodological issues regarding what it takes to consider a neurobiological or behavioral effect to be 'unconscious,' and provide a platform for rigorously investigating unconscious perception in future studies. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4749556/ /pubmed/26433023 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651 Text en © 2015, Peters et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Peters, Megan A K Lau, Hakwan Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title | Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title_full | Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title_fullStr | Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed | Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title_short | Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
title_sort | human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26433023 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersmeganak humanobservershaveoptimalintrospectiveaccesstoperceptualprocessesevenforvisuallymaskedstimuli AT lauhakwan humanobservershaveoptimalintrospectiveaccesstoperceptualprocessesevenforvisuallymaskedstimuli |