Cargando…

Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Rotarix™, GSK’s live attenuated rotavirus vaccine, was introduced in Japan in 2011. A recent trend in reduction of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) due to this vaccine was described. However, an observed/expected analysis showed a temporal association with intussusception within 7 days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ledent, Edouard, Lieftucht, Alfons, Buyse, Hubert, Sugiyama, Keiji, Mckenna, Michael, Holl, Katsiaryna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26748506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0376-7
_version_ 1782415294840438784
author Ledent, Edouard
Lieftucht, Alfons
Buyse, Hubert
Sugiyama, Keiji
Mckenna, Michael
Holl, Katsiaryna
author_facet Ledent, Edouard
Lieftucht, Alfons
Buyse, Hubert
Sugiyama, Keiji
Mckenna, Michael
Holl, Katsiaryna
author_sort Ledent, Edouard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rotarix™, GSK’s live attenuated rotavirus vaccine, was introduced in Japan in 2011. A recent trend in reduction of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) due to this vaccine was described. However, an observed/expected analysis showed a temporal association with intussusception within 7 days post dose 1. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we compare the benefit and risk of vaccination side-by-side in a benefit–risk analysis. METHODS: The number of vaccine-preventable RVGE-associated hospitalizations and deaths (benefit) and intussusception-associated hospitalizations and deaths (risk) following two doses of Rotarix™ in Japan was compared using simulations. Source data included peer-reviewed clinical and epidemiological publications, Japanese governmental statistics (Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications), and market survey data. RESULTS: For a birth cohort of 1 million vaccinated Japanese children followed for 5 years, the benefit–risk analysis suggested that the vaccine would prevent ~17,900 hospitalizations and ~6.3 deaths associated with RVGE. At the same time, vaccination would be associated with about ~50 intussusception hospitalizations and ~0.017 intussusception deaths. Therefore, for every intussusception hospitalization caused by vaccination and for one intussusception-associated death, 350 (95 % CI 69–2510) RVGE-associated hospitalizations and 366 (95 % CI 59–3271) RVGE-associated deaths are prevented, respectively, by vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit–risk balance for Rotarix™ is favorable in Japan. From a public health perspective, the benefits in terms of prevented RVGE hospitalizations and deaths for the vaccinated population far exceed the estimated risks due to intussusception. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0376-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4749653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47496532016-02-19 Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis Ledent, Edouard Lieftucht, Alfons Buyse, Hubert Sugiyama, Keiji Mckenna, Michael Holl, Katsiaryna Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Rotarix™, GSK’s live attenuated rotavirus vaccine, was introduced in Japan in 2011. A recent trend in reduction of rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) due to this vaccine was described. However, an observed/expected analysis showed a temporal association with intussusception within 7 days post dose 1. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we compare the benefit and risk of vaccination side-by-side in a benefit–risk analysis. METHODS: The number of vaccine-preventable RVGE-associated hospitalizations and deaths (benefit) and intussusception-associated hospitalizations and deaths (risk) following two doses of Rotarix™ in Japan was compared using simulations. Source data included peer-reviewed clinical and epidemiological publications, Japanese governmental statistics (Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications), and market survey data. RESULTS: For a birth cohort of 1 million vaccinated Japanese children followed for 5 years, the benefit–risk analysis suggested that the vaccine would prevent ~17,900 hospitalizations and ~6.3 deaths associated with RVGE. At the same time, vaccination would be associated with about ~50 intussusception hospitalizations and ~0.017 intussusception deaths. Therefore, for every intussusception hospitalization caused by vaccination and for one intussusception-associated death, 350 (95 % CI 69–2510) RVGE-associated hospitalizations and 366 (95 % CI 59–3271) RVGE-associated deaths are prevented, respectively, by vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit–risk balance for Rotarix™ is favorable in Japan. From a public health perspective, the benefits in terms of prevented RVGE hospitalizations and deaths for the vaccinated population far exceed the estimated risks due to intussusception. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0376-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-01-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4749653/ /pubmed/26748506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0376-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ledent, Edouard
Lieftucht, Alfons
Buyse, Hubert
Sugiyama, Keiji
Mckenna, Michael
Holl, Katsiaryna
Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title_full Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title_fullStr Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title_short Post-Marketing Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rotavirus Vaccination in Japan: A Simulation and Modelling Analysis
title_sort post-marketing benefit–risk assessment of rotavirus vaccination in japan: a simulation and modelling analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26748506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-015-0376-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ledentedouard postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis
AT lieftuchtalfons postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis
AT buysehubert postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis
AT sugiyamakeiji postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis
AT mckennamichael postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis
AT hollkatsiaryna postmarketingbenefitriskassessmentofrotavirusvaccinationinjapanasimulationandmodellinganalysis