Cargando…
Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Ventricular access devices (VAD) and ventriculosubgaleal shunts (VSGS) are currently both used as temporising devices to affect CSF drainage in neonatal posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), without clear evidence of superiority of either procedure. In this systematic review and meta-a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2951-8 |
_version_ | 1782415296658669568 |
---|---|
author | Fountain, Daniel M. Chari, Aswin Allen, Dominic James, Greg |
author_facet | Fountain, Daniel M. Chari, Aswin Allen, Dominic James, Greg |
author_sort | Fountain, Daniel M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Ventricular access devices (VAD) and ventriculosubgaleal shunts (VSGS) are currently both used as temporising devices to affect CSF drainage in neonatal posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), without clear evidence of superiority of either procedure. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the VSGS and VAD regarding complication rates, ventriculoperitoneal shunt conversion and infection rates, and mortality and long-term disability. METHODS: The review was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42015019750) and was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The literature search of five databases identified 338 publications, of which 5 met the inclusion criteria. All were retrospective cohort studies (evidence class 3b and 4). A significantly lower proportion of patients with a VSGS required CSF tapping compared to patients with a VAD (log OR −4.43, 95 % CI −6.14 to −2.72). No other significant differences between the VAD and VSGS were identified in their rates of infection (log OR 0.03, 95 % CI −0.77 to 0.84), obstruction (log OR 1.25, 95 % CI −0.21 to 2.71), ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependence (log OR −0.06, 95 % CI −0.93 to 0.82), subsequent shunt infection (log OR 0.23, 95 % CI −0.61 to 1.06), mortality (log OR 0.37, 95 % CI −0.95 to 1.70) or long-term disability (p = 0.9). In all studies, there was a lack of standardised criteria, variations between surgeons in heterogeneous cohorts of limited sample size and a lack of neurodevelopmental follow-up. This affirms the importance of an ongoing multicentre, prospective pilot study comparing these two temporising procedures to enable a more robust comparison. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2951-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4749661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47496612016-02-19 Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis Fountain, Daniel M. Chari, Aswin Allen, Dominic James, Greg Childs Nerv Syst Review Paper INTRODUCTION: Ventricular access devices (VAD) and ventriculosubgaleal shunts (VSGS) are currently both used as temporising devices to affect CSF drainage in neonatal posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), without clear evidence of superiority of either procedure. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the VSGS and VAD regarding complication rates, ventriculoperitoneal shunt conversion and infection rates, and mortality and long-term disability. METHODS: The review was registered with the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number CRD42015019750) and was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The literature search of five databases identified 338 publications, of which 5 met the inclusion criteria. All were retrospective cohort studies (evidence class 3b and 4). A significantly lower proportion of patients with a VSGS required CSF tapping compared to patients with a VAD (log OR −4.43, 95 % CI −6.14 to −2.72). No other significant differences between the VAD and VSGS were identified in their rates of infection (log OR 0.03, 95 % CI −0.77 to 0.84), obstruction (log OR 1.25, 95 % CI −0.21 to 2.71), ventriculoperitoneal shunt dependence (log OR −0.06, 95 % CI −0.93 to 0.82), subsequent shunt infection (log OR 0.23, 95 % CI −0.61 to 1.06), mortality (log OR 0.37, 95 % CI −0.95 to 1.70) or long-term disability (p = 0.9). In all studies, there was a lack of standardised criteria, variations between surgeons in heterogeneous cohorts of limited sample size and a lack of neurodevelopmental follow-up. This affirms the importance of an ongoing multicentre, prospective pilot study comparing these two temporising procedures to enable a more robust comparison. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2951-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-11 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4749661/ /pubmed/26560885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2951-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Fountain, Daniel M. Chari, Aswin Allen, Dominic James, Greg Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of the use of ventricular access devices and ventriculosubgaleal shunts in posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26560885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2951-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fountaindanielm comparisonoftheuseofventricularaccessdevicesandventriculosubgalealshuntsinposthaemorrhagichydrocephalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chariaswin comparisonoftheuseofventricularaccessdevicesandventriculosubgalealshuntsinposthaemorrhagichydrocephalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT allendominic comparisonoftheuseofventricularaccessdevicesandventriculosubgalealshuntsinposthaemorrhagichydrocephalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jamesgreg comparisonoftheuseofventricularaccessdevicesandventriculosubgalealshuntsinposthaemorrhagichydrocephalussystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |