Cargando…

Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the dosimetry and efficiency of two modern radiosurgery [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)] modalities for multiple brain metastases [Gamma Knife (GK) and LINAC-based RapidArc/volumetric modulated arc therapy], with a special focus on the comparison of low-dose spread....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Haisong, Andrews, David W., Evans, James J., Werner-Wasik, Maria, Yu, Yan, Dicker, Adam Paul, Shi, Wenyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00026
_version_ 1782415301795643392
author Liu, Haisong
Andrews, David W.
Evans, James J.
Werner-Wasik, Maria
Yu, Yan
Dicker, Adam Paul
Shi, Wenyin
author_facet Liu, Haisong
Andrews, David W.
Evans, James J.
Werner-Wasik, Maria
Yu, Yan
Dicker, Adam Paul
Shi, Wenyin
author_sort Liu, Haisong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study compares the dosimetry and efficiency of two modern radiosurgery [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)] modalities for multiple brain metastases [Gamma Knife (GK) and LINAC-based RapidArc/volumetric modulated arc therapy], with a special focus on the comparison of low-dose spread. METHODS: Six patients with three or four small brain metastases were used in this study. The size of targets varied from 0.1 to 10.5 cc. SRS doses were prescribed according to the size of lesions. SRS plans were made using both Gamma Knife(®) Perfexion and a single-isocenter, multiple non-coplanar RapidArc(®). Dosimetric parameters analyzed included RTOG conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), 12 Gy isodose volume (V(12Gy)) for each target, and the dose “spread” (Dspread) for each plan. Dspread reflects SRS plan’s capability of confining radiation to within the local vicinity of the lesion and to not spread out to the surrounding normal brain tissues. Each plan has a dose (Dspread), such that once dose decreases below Dspread (on total tissue dose–volume histogram), isodose volume starts increasing dramatically. Dspread is defined as that dose when volume increase first exceeds 20 cc/0.1 Gy dose decrease. RESULTS: RapidArc SRS has smaller CI (1.19 ± 0.14 vs. 1.50 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) and larger GI (4.77 ± 1.49 vs. 3.65 ± 0.98, p < 0.01). V(12Gy) results were comparable (2.73 ± 1.38 vs. 3.06 ± 2.20 cc, p = 0.58). Moderate to lower dose spread, V6, V4.5, and V3, were also equivalent. GK plans achieved better very low-dose spread (≤3 Gy) and also had slightly smaller Dspread, 1.9 vs. 2.5 Gy. Total treatment time for GK is estimated between 60 and 100 min. GK treatments are between 3 and 5 times longer compared to RapidArc treatment techniques. CONCLUSION: Dosimetric parameters reflecting prescription dose conformality (CI), dose fall off (GI), radiation necrosis indicator (V(12Gy)), and dose spread (Dspread) were compared between GK SRS and RapidArc SRS for multi-mets. RapidArc plans have smaller CI but larger GI. V(12Gy) are comparable. GK appears better at reducing only very low-dose spread (<3 Gy). The treatment time of RapidArc SRS is significantly reduced compared to GK SRS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4749694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47496942016-02-22 Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife Liu, Haisong Andrews, David W. Evans, James J. Werner-Wasik, Maria Yu, Yan Dicker, Adam Paul Shi, Wenyin Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: This study compares the dosimetry and efficiency of two modern radiosurgery [stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)] modalities for multiple brain metastases [Gamma Knife (GK) and LINAC-based RapidArc/volumetric modulated arc therapy], with a special focus on the comparison of low-dose spread. METHODS: Six patients with three or four small brain metastases were used in this study. The size of targets varied from 0.1 to 10.5 cc. SRS doses were prescribed according to the size of lesions. SRS plans were made using both Gamma Knife(®) Perfexion and a single-isocenter, multiple non-coplanar RapidArc(®). Dosimetric parameters analyzed included RTOG conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), 12 Gy isodose volume (V(12Gy)) for each target, and the dose “spread” (Dspread) for each plan. Dspread reflects SRS plan’s capability of confining radiation to within the local vicinity of the lesion and to not spread out to the surrounding normal brain tissues. Each plan has a dose (Dspread), such that once dose decreases below Dspread (on total tissue dose–volume histogram), isodose volume starts increasing dramatically. Dspread is defined as that dose when volume increase first exceeds 20 cc/0.1 Gy dose decrease. RESULTS: RapidArc SRS has smaller CI (1.19 ± 0.14 vs. 1.50 ± 0.16, p < 0.001) and larger GI (4.77 ± 1.49 vs. 3.65 ± 0.98, p < 0.01). V(12Gy) results were comparable (2.73 ± 1.38 vs. 3.06 ± 2.20 cc, p = 0.58). Moderate to lower dose spread, V6, V4.5, and V3, were also equivalent. GK plans achieved better very low-dose spread (≤3 Gy) and also had slightly smaller Dspread, 1.9 vs. 2.5 Gy. Total treatment time for GK is estimated between 60 and 100 min. GK treatments are between 3 and 5 times longer compared to RapidArc treatment techniques. CONCLUSION: Dosimetric parameters reflecting prescription dose conformality (CI), dose fall off (GI), radiation necrosis indicator (V(12Gy)), and dose spread (Dspread) were compared between GK SRS and RapidArc SRS for multi-mets. RapidArc plans have smaller CI but larger GI. V(12Gy) are comparable. GK appears better at reducing only very low-dose spread (<3 Gy). The treatment time of RapidArc SRS is significantly reduced compared to GK SRS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4749694/ /pubmed/26904504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00026 Text en Copyright © 2016 Liu, Andrews, Evans, Werner-Wasik, Yu, Dicker and Shi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Liu, Haisong
Andrews, David W.
Evans, James J.
Werner-Wasik, Maria
Yu, Yan
Dicker, Adam Paul
Shi, Wenyin
Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title_full Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title_fullStr Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title_full_unstemmed Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title_short Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife
title_sort plan quality and treatment efficiency for radiosurgery to multiple brain metastases: non-coplanar rapidarc vs. gamma knife
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2016.00026
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhaisong planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT andrewsdavidw planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT evansjamesj planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT wernerwasikmaria planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT yuyan planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT dickeradampaul planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife
AT shiwenyin planqualityandtreatmentefficiencyforradiosurgerytomultiplebrainmetastasesnoncoplanarrapidarcvsgammaknife