Cargando…
The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075 |
_version_ | 1782415321241485312 |
---|---|
author | Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Scarica, Catello Palagiano, Antonio Canipari, Rita Rienzi, Laura |
author_facet | Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Scarica, Catello Palagiano, Antonio Canipari, Rita Rienzi, Laura |
author_sort | Cimadomo, Danilo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology is the potential detrimental effect that the biopsy itself can have upon the embryo. Different embryo biopsy strategies have been proposed. Cleavage stage blastomere biopsy still represents the most commonly used method in Europe nowadays, although this approach has been shown to have a negative impact on embryo viability and implantation potential. Polar body biopsy has been proposed as an alternative to embryo biopsy especially for aneuploidy testing. However, to date no sufficiently powered study has clarified the impact of this procedure on embryo reproductive competence. Blastocyst stage biopsy represents nowadays the safest approach not to impact embryo implantation potential. For this reason, as well as for the evidences of a higher consistency of the molecular analysis when performed on trophectoderm cells, blastocyst biopsy implementation is gradually increasing worldwide. The aim of this review is to present the evidences published to date on the impact of the biopsy at different stages of preimplantation development upon human embryos reproductive potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4749789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47497892016-03-03 The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Scarica, Catello Palagiano, Antonio Canipari, Rita Rienzi, Laura Biomed Res Int Review Article Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology is the potential detrimental effect that the biopsy itself can have upon the embryo. Different embryo biopsy strategies have been proposed. Cleavage stage blastomere biopsy still represents the most commonly used method in Europe nowadays, although this approach has been shown to have a negative impact on embryo viability and implantation potential. Polar body biopsy has been proposed as an alternative to embryo biopsy especially for aneuploidy testing. However, to date no sufficiently powered study has clarified the impact of this procedure on embryo reproductive competence. Blastocyst stage biopsy represents nowadays the safest approach not to impact embryo implantation potential. For this reason, as well as for the evidences of a higher consistency of the molecular analysis when performed on trophectoderm cells, blastocyst biopsy implementation is gradually increasing worldwide. The aim of this review is to present the evidences published to date on the impact of the biopsy at different stages of preimplantation development upon human embryos reproductive potential. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4749789/ /pubmed/26942198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075 Text en Copyright © 2016 Danilo Cimadomo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Scarica, Catello Palagiano, Antonio Canipari, Rita Rienzi, Laura The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title | The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title_full | The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title_short | The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis |
title_sort | impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cimadomodanilo theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT capalboantonio theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT ubaldifilippomaria theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT scaricacatello theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT palagianoantonio theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT caniparirita theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT rienzilaura theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT cimadomodanilo impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT capalboantonio impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT ubaldifilippomaria impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT scaricacatello impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT palagianoantonio impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT caniparirita impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis AT rienzilaura impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis |