Cargando…

The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cimadomo, Danilo, Capalbo, Antonio, Ubaldi, Filippo Maria, Scarica, Catello, Palagiano, Antonio, Canipari, Rita, Rienzi, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075
_version_ 1782415321241485312
author Cimadomo, Danilo
Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Scarica, Catello
Palagiano, Antonio
Canipari, Rita
Rienzi, Laura
author_facet Cimadomo, Danilo
Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Scarica, Catello
Palagiano, Antonio
Canipari, Rita
Rienzi, Laura
author_sort Cimadomo, Danilo
collection PubMed
description Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology is the potential detrimental effect that the biopsy itself can have upon the embryo. Different embryo biopsy strategies have been proposed. Cleavage stage blastomere biopsy still represents the most commonly used method in Europe nowadays, although this approach has been shown to have a negative impact on embryo viability and implantation potential. Polar body biopsy has been proposed as an alternative to embryo biopsy especially for aneuploidy testing. However, to date no sufficiently powered study has clarified the impact of this procedure on embryo reproductive competence. Blastocyst stage biopsy represents nowadays the safest approach not to impact embryo implantation potential. For this reason, as well as for the evidences of a higher consistency of the molecular analysis when performed on trophectoderm cells, blastocyst biopsy implementation is gradually increasing worldwide. The aim of this review is to present the evidences published to date on the impact of the biopsy at different stages of preimplantation development upon human embryos reproductive potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4749789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47497892016-03-03 The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Scarica, Catello Palagiano, Antonio Canipari, Rita Rienzi, Laura Biomed Res Int Review Article Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology is the potential detrimental effect that the biopsy itself can have upon the embryo. Different embryo biopsy strategies have been proposed. Cleavage stage blastomere biopsy still represents the most commonly used method in Europe nowadays, although this approach has been shown to have a negative impact on embryo viability and implantation potential. Polar body biopsy has been proposed as an alternative to embryo biopsy especially for aneuploidy testing. However, to date no sufficiently powered study has clarified the impact of this procedure on embryo reproductive competence. Blastocyst stage biopsy represents nowadays the safest approach not to impact embryo implantation potential. For this reason, as well as for the evidences of a higher consistency of the molecular analysis when performed on trophectoderm cells, blastocyst biopsy implementation is gradually increasing worldwide. The aim of this review is to present the evidences published to date on the impact of the biopsy at different stages of preimplantation development upon human embryos reproductive potential. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4749789/ /pubmed/26942198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075 Text en Copyright © 2016 Danilo Cimadomo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cimadomo, Danilo
Capalbo, Antonio
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
Scarica, Catello
Palagiano, Antonio
Canipari, Rita
Rienzi, Laura
The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title_full The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title_fullStr The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title_short The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
title_sort impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7193075
work_keys_str_mv AT cimadomodanilo theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT capalboantonio theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT ubaldifilippomaria theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT scaricacatello theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT palagianoantonio theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT caniparirita theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT rienzilaura theimpactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT cimadomodanilo impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT capalboantonio impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT ubaldifilippomaria impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT scaricacatello impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT palagianoantonio impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT caniparirita impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis
AT rienzilaura impactofbiopsyonhumanembryodevelopmentalpotentialduringpreimplantationgeneticdiagnosis