Cargando…

A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background. There are a few papers that compared the lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with the posterior TAP block. Our study aimed to compare retrospectively the quality of analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery using the lateral TAP block with general anesthesia versus the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi, Ueshima, Hironobu, Sakai, Ryomi, Otake, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4598583
_version_ 1782415321688178688
author Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi
Ueshima, Hironobu
Sakai, Ryomi
Otake, Hiroshi
author_facet Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi
Ueshima, Hironobu
Sakai, Ryomi
Otake, Hiroshi
author_sort Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi
collection PubMed
description Background. There are a few papers that compared the lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with the posterior TAP block. Our study aimed to compare retrospectively the quality of analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery using the lateral TAP block with general anesthesia versus the posterior TAP block with general anesthesia. Method. Sixty-seven adult female patients were included in this retrospective study. Of these patients, thirty-four patients received the lateral TAP block with general anesthesia (lat. TAP group), and the rest of thirty-three patients received the posterior TAP block with general anesthesia (pos. TAP group). Pain scores both at rest and at movement and the use of additional analgesic drugs were recorded in the postoperative care unit within twenty-four hours after the operation. Postoperative complications were noted. Results. Patients who received pos. TAP reported lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in all points, within twenty-four hours after the operation, than patients who received lat. TAP. Moreover, with the use of additional analgesic drugs, the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first twenty-four hours after surgery was lower in the pos. TAP group than in the lat. TAP group. Conclusion. The posterior TAP block provided more effective analgesia than the lateral TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4749791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47497912016-03-03 A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi Ueshima, Hironobu Sakai, Ryomi Otake, Hiroshi Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article Background. There are a few papers that compared the lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with the posterior TAP block. Our study aimed to compare retrospectively the quality of analgesia after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery using the lateral TAP block with general anesthesia versus the posterior TAP block with general anesthesia. Method. Sixty-seven adult female patients were included in this retrospective study. Of these patients, thirty-four patients received the lateral TAP block with general anesthesia (lat. TAP group), and the rest of thirty-three patients received the posterior TAP block with general anesthesia (pos. TAP group). Pain scores both at rest and at movement and the use of additional analgesic drugs were recorded in the postoperative care unit within twenty-four hours after the operation. Postoperative complications were noted. Results. Patients who received pos. TAP reported lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in all points, within twenty-four hours after the operation, than patients who received lat. TAP. Moreover, with the use of additional analgesic drugs, the incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first twenty-four hours after surgery was lower in the pos. TAP group than in the lat. TAP group. Conclusion. The posterior TAP block provided more effective analgesia than the lateral TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4749791/ /pubmed/26941794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4598583 Text en Copyright © 2016 Sakatoshi Yoshiyama et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yoshiyama, Sakatoshi
Ueshima, Hironobu
Sakai, Ryomi
Otake, Hiroshi
A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_short A Posterior TAP Block Provides More Effective Analgesia Than a Lateral TAP Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_sort posterior tap block provides more effective analgesia than a lateral tap block in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4598583
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshiyamasakatoshi aposteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT ueshimahironobu aposteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT sakairyomi aposteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT otakehiroshi aposteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT yoshiyamasakatoshi posteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT ueshimahironobu posteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT sakairyomi posteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT otakehiroshi posteriortapblockprovidesmoreeffectiveanalgesiathanalateraltapblockinpatientsundergoinglaparoscopicgynecologicsurgeryaretrospectivestudy