Cargando…
Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope
The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally impl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007 |
_version_ | 1782415385017974784 |
---|---|
author | Haarmark, Christian Kanters, Jørgen K. Mehlsen, Jesper |
author_facet | Haarmark, Christian Kanters, Jørgen K. Mehlsen, Jesper |
author_sort | Haarmark, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4750138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47501382016-03-02 Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope Haarmark, Christian Kanters, Jørgen K. Mehlsen, Jesper Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article The diagnosis of recurrent syncope in patients with pacemakers (PM) is quite challenging and the etiology of syncope is often multifactorial. To portray the mechanism of syncope in PM patients, we report the results of head-up tilt table testing (HUT) in a series of patients with PM, originally implanted for reasons other than neurally mediated syncope, referred due to syncope or pre-syncope (aborted syncope, vertigo, suspected orthostatic hypotension). Forty-one patients with PM undergoing a HUT in our syncope unit between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st 2011 were included. A standard HUT protocol with nitroglycerine provocation was used and the test results were classified according to current guidelines. Baseline data were retrieved from the medical records. Overall, 54% of patients had a positive response to HUT. Vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response were the most prevalent responses accounting for 72% of patients with a positive test. There were no differences between groups with positive or negative test result regarding age, gender, resting blood pressure and heart rate, daily fluid intake, pacing mode, pacing indication or pacing rhythm at rest. HUT in patients with pacemakers has a high diagnostic yield. Although, the majority of patients had a vasodepressor or orthostatic hypotensive response, cardioinhibitory response leading to syncope was also seen. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4750138/ /pubmed/26937118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007 Text en Copyright © 2015, Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Haarmark, Christian Kanters, Jørgen K. Mehlsen, Jesper Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title | Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title_full | Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title_fullStr | Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title_full_unstemmed | Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title_short | Tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
title_sort | tilt-table testing of patients with pacemaker and recurrent syncope |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2015.10.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haarmarkchristian tilttabletestingofpatientswithpacemakerandrecurrentsyncope AT kantersjørgenk tilttabletestingofpatientswithpacemakerandrecurrentsyncope AT mehlsenjesper tilttabletestingofpatientswithpacemakerandrecurrentsyncope |