Cargando…
Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective
BACKGROUND: In view of the increasing pressure on the UK’s maternity units, new methods of labour induction are required to alleviate the burden on the National Health Service, while maintaining the quality of care for women during delivery. A model was developed to evaluate the resource use associa...
Autores principales: | Draycott, T., van der Nelson, H., Montouchet, C., Ruff, L., Andersson, F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26864022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1278-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Ting, Ning-Shiuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)