Cargando…

A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals

OBJECTIVE: Unnecessary exposure of the abdomen, arms or head may lead to a substantial increase of the radiation dose in portable chest X-rays on the neonatal intensive care unit. The objective was to identify potential factors influencing inappropriate exposure of non-thoracic structures in two tea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stollfuss, J., Schneider, K., Krüger-Stollfuss, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.07.002
_version_ 1782415460428414976
author Stollfuss, J.
Schneider, K.
Krüger-Stollfuss, I.
author_facet Stollfuss, J.
Schneider, K.
Krüger-Stollfuss, I.
author_sort Stollfuss, J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Unnecessary exposure of the abdomen, arms or head may lead to a substantial increase of the radiation dose in portable chest X-rays on the neonatal intensive care unit. The objective was to identify potential factors influencing inappropriate exposure of non-thoracic structures in two teaching hospitals. METHODS: The study analysed 200 consecutive digital chest radiographs in 20 preterm neonates (mean gestation 25 ± 1 weeks). Demographical data, tube settings and exposure parameters were recorded. To grade the collimation, we used a scoring system with a maximum of 12 exposed non-thoracic structures. Length of gestation, age, the radiographer, years of experience in performing X-rays and the number of in situ catheters or lines, were correlated with collimation quality. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the rates of optimal images obtained in the two hospitals (0.32 vs 0.39, n.s.). Scores showed that most suboptimal images had only mildly reduced image quality (1.40 ± 1.38 vs 1.20 ± 1.43, n.s.). Length of gestation or presence of surgical drains, catheters and tubes had no obvious effects on the exposure of non-thoracic structures. Large intra-individual variation in optimal collimation (14–86%) was noted for the radiographers in both hospitals; this was unrelated to their respective years of experience. CONCLUSION: In our study, the only identifiable factor influencing the collimation of portable chest radiographs in preterm infants was the radiographer’s dedication and awareness. There were no apparent differences between the hospitals investigated. Exposure of non-thoracic structures was relatively frequent and mainly involved the proximal humeri.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47506162016-03-02 A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals Stollfuss, J. Schneider, K. Krüger-Stollfuss, I. Eur J Radiol Open Article OBJECTIVE: Unnecessary exposure of the abdomen, arms or head may lead to a substantial increase of the radiation dose in portable chest X-rays on the neonatal intensive care unit. The objective was to identify potential factors influencing inappropriate exposure of non-thoracic structures in two teaching hospitals. METHODS: The study analysed 200 consecutive digital chest radiographs in 20 preterm neonates (mean gestation 25 ± 1 weeks). Demographical data, tube settings and exposure parameters were recorded. To grade the collimation, we used a scoring system with a maximum of 12 exposed non-thoracic structures. Length of gestation, age, the radiographer, years of experience in performing X-rays and the number of in situ catheters or lines, were correlated with collimation quality. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the rates of optimal images obtained in the two hospitals (0.32 vs 0.39, n.s.). Scores showed that most suboptimal images had only mildly reduced image quality (1.40 ± 1.38 vs 1.20 ± 1.43, n.s.). Length of gestation or presence of surgical drains, catheters and tubes had no obvious effects on the exposure of non-thoracic structures. Large intra-individual variation in optimal collimation (14–86%) was noted for the radiographers in both hospitals; this was unrelated to their respective years of experience. CONCLUSION: In our study, the only identifiable factor influencing the collimation of portable chest radiographs in preterm infants was the radiographer’s dedication and awareness. There were no apparent differences between the hospitals investigated. Exposure of non-thoracic structures was relatively frequent and mainly involved the proximal humeri. Elsevier 2015-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4750616/ /pubmed/26937444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.07.002 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stollfuss, J.
Schneider, K.
Krüger-Stollfuss, I.
A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title_full A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title_fullStr A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title_short A comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
title_sort comparative study of collimation in bedside chest radiography for preterm infants in two teaching hospitals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT stollfussj acomparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals
AT schneiderk acomparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals
AT krugerstollfussi acomparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals
AT stollfussj comparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals
AT schneiderk comparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals
AT krugerstollfussi comparativestudyofcollimationinbedsidechestradiographyforpreterminfantsintwoteachinghospitals