Cargando…

Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between renal indexes and functional MRI in a population of kidney transplant recipients who underwent MR with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the transplanted graft. METHOD: Study population inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmucci, Stefano, Cappello, Giuseppina, Attinà, Giancarlo, Foti, Pietro Valerio, Siverino, Rita Olivia Anna, Roccasalva, Federica, Piccoli, Marina, Sinagra, Nunziata, Milone, Pietro, Veroux, Massimiliano, Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.05.001
_version_ 1782415462009667584
author Palmucci, Stefano
Cappello, Giuseppina
Attinà, Giancarlo
Foti, Pietro Valerio
Siverino, Rita Olivia Anna
Roccasalva, Federica
Piccoli, Marina
Sinagra, Nunziata
Milone, Pietro
Veroux, Massimiliano
Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
author_facet Palmucci, Stefano
Cappello, Giuseppina
Attinà, Giancarlo
Foti, Pietro Valerio
Siverino, Rita Olivia Anna
Roccasalva, Federica
Piccoli, Marina
Sinagra, Nunziata
Milone, Pietro
Veroux, Massimiliano
Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
author_sort Palmucci, Stefano
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between renal indexes and functional MRI in a population of kidney transplant recipients who underwent MR with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the transplanted graft. METHOD: Study population included 40 patients with single kidney transplant. The patients were divided into 3 groups, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CrCl) values calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: group A, including patients with normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min); group B, which refers to patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl > 30 but <60 mL/min); and, finally, group C, which means severe renal deterioration (CrCl ≤ 30 mL/min). All patients were investigated with a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, acquiring DWI and DTI sequences. A Mann–Whitney U test was adopted to compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for prediction of normal renal function (group A) and renal failure (group C). Pearson correlation was performed between renal clearance and functional imaging parameter (ADC and FA), obtained for cortical and medullar regions. RESULTS: Mann–Whitney U test revealed a highly significant difference (p < 0.01) between patients with low CrCl (group C) and normal CrCl (group A) considering both medullar ADC and FA and cortical ADC. Regarding contiguous groups, the difference between group B and C was highly significant (p < 0.01) for medullar ADC and significant (p < 0.05) for cortical ADC and medullar FA. No difference between these groups was found considering cortical FA. Analyzing groups A and B, we found a significant difference (p < 0.05) for medullar both ADC and FA, while no difference was found for cortical ADC and FA. Strongest Pearson correlation was found between CrCl and medullar ADC (r = 0.65). For predicting normal renal function or severe renal impairment, highest values of AUC were observed using medullar ADC cut-off values (respectively 0.885 and 0.871); medullar FA showed also high accuracy (respectively 0.831 and 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: DWI and DTI are promising tools for non-invasive monitoring of renal function; medullar ADC proved to be the best parameter for renal function assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47506252016-03-02 Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys Palmucci, Stefano Cappello, Giuseppina Attinà, Giancarlo Foti, Pietro Valerio Siverino, Rita Olivia Anna Roccasalva, Federica Piccoli, Marina Sinagra, Nunziata Milone, Pietro Veroux, Massimiliano Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo Eur J Radiol Open Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the relation between renal indexes and functional MRI in a population of kidney transplant recipients who underwent MR with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the transplanted graft. METHOD: Study population included 40 patients with single kidney transplant. The patients were divided into 3 groups, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CrCl) values calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula: group A, including patients with normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min); group B, which refers to patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl > 30 but <60 mL/min); and, finally, group C, which means severe renal deterioration (CrCl ≤ 30 mL/min). All patients were investigated with a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner, acquiring DWI and DTI sequences. A Mann–Whitney U test was adopted to compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for prediction of normal renal function (group A) and renal failure (group C). Pearson correlation was performed between renal clearance and functional imaging parameter (ADC and FA), obtained for cortical and medullar regions. RESULTS: Mann–Whitney U test revealed a highly significant difference (p < 0.01) between patients with low CrCl (group C) and normal CrCl (group A) considering both medullar ADC and FA and cortical ADC. Regarding contiguous groups, the difference between group B and C was highly significant (p < 0.01) for medullar ADC and significant (p < 0.05) for cortical ADC and medullar FA. No difference between these groups was found considering cortical FA. Analyzing groups A and B, we found a significant difference (p < 0.05) for medullar both ADC and FA, while no difference was found for cortical ADC and FA. Strongest Pearson correlation was found between CrCl and medullar ADC (r = 0.65). For predicting normal renal function or severe renal impairment, highest values of AUC were observed using medullar ADC cut-off values (respectively 0.885 and 0.871); medullar FA showed also high accuracy (respectively 0.831 and 0.853). CONCLUSIONS: DWI and DTI are promising tools for non-invasive monitoring of renal function; medullar ADC proved to be the best parameter for renal function assessment. Elsevier 2015-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4750625/ /pubmed/26937439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.05.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Palmucci, Stefano
Cappello, Giuseppina
Attinà, Giancarlo
Foti, Pietro Valerio
Siverino, Rita Olivia Anna
Roccasalva, Federica
Piccoli, Marina
Sinagra, Nunziata
Milone, Pietro
Veroux, Massimiliano
Ettorre, Giovanni Carlo
Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title_full Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title_fullStr Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title_short Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
title_sort diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT palmuccistefano diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT cappellogiuseppina diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT attinagiancarlo diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT fotipietrovalerio diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT siverinoritaoliviaanna diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT roccasalvafederica diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT piccolimarina diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT sinagranunziata diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT milonepietro diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT verouxmassimiliano diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys
AT ettorregiovannicarlo diffusionweightedimaginganddiffusiontensorimagingintheevaluationoftransplantedkidneys