Cargando…

Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance

Tigecycline is a glycylcycline antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The objectives of our study were to examine the potential of the Tet(A), Tet(K), Tet(M), and Tet(X) tetracycline resistance proteins to acquire mutations causing tigecycline resistance and to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linkevicius, Marius, Sandegren, Linus, Andersson, Dan I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26596936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02465-15
_version_ 1782415466115891200
author Linkevicius, Marius
Sandegren, Linus
Andersson, Dan I.
author_facet Linkevicius, Marius
Sandegren, Linus
Andersson, Dan I.
author_sort Linkevicius, Marius
collection PubMed
description Tigecycline is a glycylcycline antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The objectives of our study were to examine the potential of the Tet(A), Tet(K), Tet(M), and Tet(X) tetracycline resistance proteins to acquire mutations causing tigecycline resistance and to determine how this affects resistance to earlier classes of tetracyclines. Mutations in all four tet genes caused a significant increase in the tigecycline MIC in Escherichia coli, and strains expressing mutant Tet(A) and Tet(X) variants reached clinically relevant MICs (2 mg/liter and 3 mg/liter, respectively). Mutations predominantly accumulated in transmembrane domains of the efflux pumps, most likely increasing the accommodation of tigecycline as a substrate. All selected Tet(M) mutants contained at least one mutation in the functionally most important loop III of domain IV. Deletion of leucine 505 of this loop led to the highest increase of the tigecycline MIC (0.5 mg/liter) among Tet(M) mutants. It also caused collateral sensitivity to earlier classes of tetracyclines. A majority of the Tet(X) mutants showed increased activity against all three classes of tetracylines. All tested Tet proteins have the potential to acquire mutations leading to increased MICs of tigecycline. As tet genes are widely found in pathogenic bacteria and spread easily by horizontal gene transfer, resistance development by alteration of existing Tet proteins might compromise the future medical use of tigecycline. We predict that Tet(X) might become the most problematic future Tet determinant, since its weak intrinsic tigecycline activity can be mutationally improved to reach clinically relevant levels without collateral loss in activity to other tetracyclines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47506972016-02-13 Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance Linkevicius, Marius Sandegren, Linus Andersson, Dan I. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Mechanisms of Resistance Tigecycline is a glycylcycline antibiotic active against multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The objectives of our study were to examine the potential of the Tet(A), Tet(K), Tet(M), and Tet(X) tetracycline resistance proteins to acquire mutations causing tigecycline resistance and to determine how this affects resistance to earlier classes of tetracyclines. Mutations in all four tet genes caused a significant increase in the tigecycline MIC in Escherichia coli, and strains expressing mutant Tet(A) and Tet(X) variants reached clinically relevant MICs (2 mg/liter and 3 mg/liter, respectively). Mutations predominantly accumulated in transmembrane domains of the efflux pumps, most likely increasing the accommodation of tigecycline as a substrate. All selected Tet(M) mutants contained at least one mutation in the functionally most important loop III of domain IV. Deletion of leucine 505 of this loop led to the highest increase of the tigecycline MIC (0.5 mg/liter) among Tet(M) mutants. It also caused collateral sensitivity to earlier classes of tetracyclines. A majority of the Tet(X) mutants showed increased activity against all three classes of tetracylines. All tested Tet proteins have the potential to acquire mutations leading to increased MICs of tigecycline. As tet genes are widely found in pathogenic bacteria and spread easily by horizontal gene transfer, resistance development by alteration of existing Tet proteins might compromise the future medical use of tigecycline. We predict that Tet(X) might become the most problematic future Tet determinant, since its weak intrinsic tigecycline activity can be mutationally improved to reach clinically relevant levels without collateral loss in activity to other tetracyclines. American Society for Microbiology 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4750697/ /pubmed/26596936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02465-15 Text en Copyright © 2016 Linkevicius et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mechanisms of Resistance
Linkevicius, Marius
Sandegren, Linus
Andersson, Dan I.
Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title_full Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title_fullStr Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title_full_unstemmed Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title_short Potential of Tetracycline Resistance Proteins To Evolve Tigecycline Resistance
title_sort potential of tetracycline resistance proteins to evolve tigecycline resistance
topic Mechanisms of Resistance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26596936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02465-15
work_keys_str_mv AT linkeviciusmarius potentialoftetracyclineresistanceproteinstoevolvetigecyclineresistance
AT sandegrenlinus potentialoftetracyclineresistanceproteinstoevolvetigecyclineresistance
AT anderssondani potentialoftetracyclineresistanceproteinstoevolvetigecyclineresistance