Cargando…

“It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care

Background Many general practitioners (GPs) are willing to provide end-of-life (EoL) home care for their patients. International research on GPs’ approach to care in patients’ final weeks of life showed a combination of palliative measures with life-preserving actions. Aim To explore the GP’s perspe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sercu, Maria, Renterghem, Veerle Van, Pype, Peter, Aelbrecht, Karolien, Derese, Anselme, Deveugele, Myriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26654583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118837
_version_ 1782415470434975744
author Sercu, Maria
Renterghem, Veerle Van
Pype, Peter
Aelbrecht, Karolien
Derese, Anselme
Deveugele, Myriam
author_facet Sercu, Maria
Renterghem, Veerle Van
Pype, Peter
Aelbrecht, Karolien
Derese, Anselme
Deveugele, Myriam
author_sort Sercu, Maria
collection PubMed
description Background Many general practitioners (GPs) are willing to provide end-of-life (EoL) home care for their patients. International research on GPs’ approach to care in patients’ final weeks of life showed a combination of palliative measures with life-preserving actions. Aim To explore the GP’s perspective on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in EoL home care. Design Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 52 Belgian GPs involved in EoL home care. Results Nearly all GPs adopted a palliative approach and an accepting attitude towards death. The erratic course of terminal illness can challenge this approach. Disruptive medical events threaten the prospect of a peaceful end-phase and death at home and force the GP either to maintain the patient’s (quality of) life for the time being or to recognize the event as a step to life closure and “letting the patient go”. Making the “right” decision was very difficult. Influencing factors included: the nature and time of the crisis, a patient’s clinical condition at the event itself, a GP’s level of determination in deciding and negotiating “letting go” and the patient’s/family’s wishes and preparedness regarding this death. Hospitalization was often a way out. Conclusions KEY POINTS: A late transition from a life-preserving mindset to one of “letting go” has been reported as a reason why physicians resort to life-preserving actions in an end-of-life (EoL) context. We investigated GPs’ perspectives on this matter. Not all GPs involved in EoL home care adopt a “letting go” mindset. For those who do, this mindset is challenged by the erratic course of terminal illness. GPs prioritize the quality of the remaining life and the serenity of the dying process, which is threatened by disruptive medical events. Making the “right” decision is difficult. GPs feel uncertain about their own role and responsibility in deciding and negotiating the final step to life closure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47507322016-03-02 “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care Sercu, Maria Renterghem, Veerle Van Pype, Peter Aelbrecht, Karolien Derese, Anselme Deveugele, Myriam Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles Background Many general practitioners (GPs) are willing to provide end-of-life (EoL) home care for their patients. International research on GPs’ approach to care in patients’ final weeks of life showed a combination of palliative measures with life-preserving actions. Aim To explore the GP’s perspective on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in EoL home care. Design Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 52 Belgian GPs involved in EoL home care. Results Nearly all GPs adopted a palliative approach and an accepting attitude towards death. The erratic course of terminal illness can challenge this approach. Disruptive medical events threaten the prospect of a peaceful end-phase and death at home and force the GP either to maintain the patient’s (quality of) life for the time being or to recognize the event as a step to life closure and “letting the patient go”. Making the “right” decision was very difficult. Influencing factors included: the nature and time of the crisis, a patient’s clinical condition at the event itself, a GP’s level of determination in deciding and negotiating “letting go” and the patient’s/family’s wishes and preparedness regarding this death. Hospitalization was often a way out. Conclusions KEY POINTS: A late transition from a life-preserving mindset to one of “letting go” has been reported as a reason why physicians resort to life-preserving actions in an end-of-life (EoL) context. We investigated GPs’ perspectives on this matter. Not all GPs involved in EoL home care adopt a “letting go” mindset. For those who do, this mindset is challenged by the erratic course of terminal illness. GPs prioritize the quality of the remaining life and the serenity of the dying process, which is threatened by disruptive medical events. Making the “right” decision is difficult. GPs feel uncertain about their own role and responsibility in deciding and negotiating the final step to life closure. Taylor & Francis 2015-12 2015-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4750732/ /pubmed/26654583 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118837 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Sercu, Maria
Renterghem, Veerle Van
Pype, Peter
Aelbrecht, Karolien
Derese, Anselme
Deveugele, Myriam
“It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title_full “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title_fullStr “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title_full_unstemmed “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title_short “It is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
title_sort “it is not the fading candle that one expects”: general practitioners’ perspectives on life-preserving versus “letting go” decision-making in end-of-life home care
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26654583
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118837
work_keys_str_mv AT sercumaria itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare
AT renterghemveerlevan itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare
AT pypepeter itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare
AT aelbrechtkarolien itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare
AT dereseanselme itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare
AT deveugelemyriam itisnotthefadingcandlethatoneexpectsgeneralpractitionersperspectivesonlifepreservingversuslettinggodecisionmakinginendoflifehomecare