Cargando…

Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?

Objective Since acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children, the reliable exclusion of AOM by nurses might save physicians’ time for other duties. The study aim was to determine whether nurses without otoscopic experience can reliably use tympanometry or spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laine, Miia K., Tähtinen, Paula A., Ruuskanen, Olli, Löyttyniemi, Eliisa, Ruohola, Aino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118835
_version_ 1782415472292003840
author Laine, Miia K.
Tähtinen, Paula A.
Ruuskanen, Olli
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Ruohola, Aino
author_facet Laine, Miia K.
Tähtinen, Paula A.
Ruuskanen, Olli
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Ruohola, Aino
author_sort Laine, Miia K.
collection PubMed
description Objective Since acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children, the reliable exclusion of AOM by nurses might save physicians’ time for other duties. The study aim was to determine whether nurses without otoscopic experience can reliably use tympanometry or spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) to exclude AOM. Design Three nurses were trained, who performed examinations with tympanometry and SG-AR. Pneumatic otoscopy by the study physician served as the diagnostic standard. Setting Study clinic at primary health care level. Patients. 281 children 6–35 months of age. Main outcome measures Predictive values (with 95% confidence interval) for tympanometry and SG-AR, and the clinical usefulness, i.e. the proportion of visits where nurses obtained the exclusive test result from both ears of the child. Results At 459 visits, the negative predictive value of type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >–200 daPa) was 94% (91–97%). Based on type A and C1 tympanograms, the nurse could exclude AOM at 94/459 (20%) of visits. The negative predictive value of SG-AR level 1 result (>95°) was 94% (89–97%). Based on the SG-AR level 1 result, the nurse could exclude AOM at 36/459 (8%) of visits. Conclusion KEY POINTS: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children. Nurses’ role in excluding AOM is unknown. Type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >–200 daPa) obtained by nurses are reliable test results in excluding AOM. With type A and C1 tympanograms, nurses could exclude AOM only at one-fifth of the symptomatic visits. The clinical usefulness of the exclusion of AOM performed by nurses seems to be limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47507402016-03-02 Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children? Laine, Miia K. Tähtinen, Paula A. Ruuskanen, Olli Löyttyniemi, Eliisa Ruohola, Aino Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles Objective Since acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children, the reliable exclusion of AOM by nurses might save physicians’ time for other duties. The study aim was to determine whether nurses without otoscopic experience can reliably use tympanometry or spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry (SG-AR) to exclude AOM. Design Three nurses were trained, who performed examinations with tympanometry and SG-AR. Pneumatic otoscopy by the study physician served as the diagnostic standard. Setting Study clinic at primary health care level. Patients. 281 children 6–35 months of age. Main outcome measures Predictive values (with 95% confidence interval) for tympanometry and SG-AR, and the clinical usefulness, i.e. the proportion of visits where nurses obtained the exclusive test result from both ears of the child. Results At 459 visits, the negative predictive value of type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >–200 daPa) was 94% (91–97%). Based on type A and C1 tympanograms, the nurse could exclude AOM at 94/459 (20%) of visits. The negative predictive value of SG-AR level 1 result (>95°) was 94% (89–97%). Based on the SG-AR level 1 result, the nurse could exclude AOM at 36/459 (8%) of visits. Conclusion KEY POINTS: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most prevalent bacterial infection in young children. Nurses’ role in excluding AOM is unknown. Type A and C1 tympanograms (tympanometric peak pressure >–200 daPa) obtained by nurses are reliable test results in excluding AOM. With type A and C1 tympanograms, nurses could exclude AOM only at one-fifth of the symptomatic visits. The clinical usefulness of the exclusion of AOM performed by nurses seems to be limited. Taylor & Francis 2015-12 2015-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4750740/ /pubmed/26651157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118835 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Laine, Miia K.
Tähtinen, Paula A.
Ruuskanen, Olli
Löyttyniemi, Eliisa
Ruohola, Aino
Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title_full Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title_fullStr Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title_full_unstemmed Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title_short Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
title_sort can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26651157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1118835
work_keys_str_mv AT lainemiiak cantrainednursesexcludeacuteotitismediawithtympanometryoracousticreflectometryinsymptomaticchildren
AT tahtinenpaulaa cantrainednursesexcludeacuteotitismediawithtympanometryoracousticreflectometryinsymptomaticchildren
AT ruuskanenolli cantrainednursesexcludeacuteotitismediawithtympanometryoracousticreflectometryinsymptomaticchildren
AT loyttyniemieliisa cantrainednursesexcludeacuteotitismediawithtympanometryoracousticreflectometryinsymptomaticchildren
AT ruoholaaino cantrainednursesexcludeacuteotitismediawithtympanometryoracousticreflectometryinsymptomaticchildren