Cargando…
Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livesto...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IPC Science and Technology Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 |
_version_ | 1782415493953486848 |
---|---|
author | zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Phalan, Ben Green, Rhys E. Balmford, Andrew |
author_facet | zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Phalan, Ben Green, Rhys E. Balmford, Andrew |
author_sort | zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livestock farming. Food wastes have a long history as a source of environmentally benign animal feed, but their inclusion in feed is currently banned in the EU because of disease control concerns. A number of East Asian states have in the last 20 years, however, introduced regulated, centralised systems for safely recycling food wastes into animal feed. This study quantifies the land use savings that could be realised by changing EU legislation to promote the use of food wastes as animal feed and reviews the policy, public, and industry barriers to the use of food waste as feed. Our results suggest that the application of existing technologies could reduce the land use of EU pork (20% of world production) by one fifth, potentially saving 1.8 million hectares of agricultural land. While swill presents a low-cost, low-impact animal feed, widespread adoption would require efforts to address consumer and farmer concerns over food safety and disease control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4750877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | IPC Science and Technology Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47508772016-03-02 Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Phalan, Ben Green, Rhys E. Balmford, Andrew Food Policy Article Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livestock farming. Food wastes have a long history as a source of environmentally benign animal feed, but their inclusion in feed is currently banned in the EU because of disease control concerns. A number of East Asian states have in the last 20 years, however, introduced regulated, centralised systems for safely recycling food wastes into animal feed. This study quantifies the land use savings that could be realised by changing EU legislation to promote the use of food wastes as animal feed and reviews the policy, public, and industry barriers to the use of food waste as feed. Our results suggest that the application of existing technologies could reduce the land use of EU pork (20% of world production) by one fifth, potentially saving 1.8 million hectares of agricultural land. While swill presents a low-cost, low-impact animal feed, widespread adoption would require efforts to address consumer and farmer concerns over food safety and disease control. IPC Science and Technology Press 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4750877/ /pubmed/26949285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Phalan, Ben Green, Rhys E. Balmford, Andrew Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title | Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title_full | Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title_fullStr | Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title_short | Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
title_sort | reducing the land use of eu pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zuermgassenerasmuskhj reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway AT phalanben reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway AT greenrhyse reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway AT balmfordandrew reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway |