Cargando…

Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way

Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livesto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J., Phalan, Ben, Green, Rhys E., Balmford, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IPC Science and Technology Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001
_version_ 1782415493953486848
author zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Phalan, Ben
Green, Rhys E.
Balmford, Andrew
author_facet zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Phalan, Ben
Green, Rhys E.
Balmford, Andrew
author_sort zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
collection PubMed
description Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livestock farming. Food wastes have a long history as a source of environmentally benign animal feed, but their inclusion in feed is currently banned in the EU because of disease control concerns. A number of East Asian states have in the last 20 years, however, introduced regulated, centralised systems for safely recycling food wastes into animal feed. This study quantifies the land use savings that could be realised by changing EU legislation to promote the use of food wastes as animal feed and reviews the policy, public, and industry barriers to the use of food waste as feed. Our results suggest that the application of existing technologies could reduce the land use of EU pork (20% of world production) by one fifth, potentially saving 1.8 million hectares of agricultural land. While swill presents a low-cost, low-impact animal feed, widespread adoption would require efforts to address consumer and farmer concerns over food safety and disease control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher IPC Science and Technology Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47508772016-03-02 Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J. Phalan, Ben Green, Rhys E. Balmford, Andrew Food Policy Article Livestock production occupies approximately 75% of agricultural land, consumes 35% of the world’s grain, and produces 14.5% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. With demand for meat and dairy products forecast to increase 60% by 2050, there is a pressing need to reduce the footprint of livestock farming. Food wastes have a long history as a source of environmentally benign animal feed, but their inclusion in feed is currently banned in the EU because of disease control concerns. A number of East Asian states have in the last 20 years, however, introduced regulated, centralised systems for safely recycling food wastes into animal feed. This study quantifies the land use savings that could be realised by changing EU legislation to promote the use of food wastes as animal feed and reviews the policy, public, and industry barriers to the use of food waste as feed. Our results suggest that the application of existing technologies could reduce the land use of EU pork (20% of world production) by one fifth, potentially saving 1.8 million hectares of agricultural land. While swill presents a low-cost, low-impact animal feed, widespread adoption would require efforts to address consumer and farmer concerns over food safety and disease control. IPC Science and Technology Press 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4750877/ /pubmed/26949285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K.H.J.
Phalan, Ben
Green, Rhys E.
Balmford, Andrew
Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title_full Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title_fullStr Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title_short Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
title_sort reducing the land use of eu pork production: where there’s swill, there’s a way
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26949285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT zuermgassenerasmuskhj reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway
AT phalanben reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway
AT greenrhyse reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway
AT balmfordandrew reducingthelanduseofeuporkproductionwheretheresswilltheresaway