Cargando…
Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and huma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610 |
_version_ | 1782415516003991552 |
---|---|
author | Sheng, Sun-Ren Xu, Hua-Zi Wang, Yong-Li Zhu, Qing-An Mao, Fang-Min Lin, Yan Wang, Xiang-Yang |
author_facet | Sheng, Sun-Ren Xu, Hua-Zi Wang, Yong-Li Zhu, Qing-An Mao, Fang-Min Lin, Yan Wang, Xiang-Yang |
author_sort | Sheng, Sun-Ren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported. PURPOSE: To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs). METHODS: Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD). RESULTS: The atlantoaxial (C1–2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4–C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute. CONCLUSION: Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4750986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47509862016-02-26 Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans Sheng, Sun-Ren Xu, Hua-Zi Wang, Yong-Li Zhu, Qing-An Mao, Fang-Min Lin, Yan Wang, Xiang-Yang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported. PURPOSE: To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs). METHODS: Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD). RESULTS: The atlantoaxial (C1–2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4–C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute. CONCLUSION: Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine. Public Library of Science 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4750986/ /pubmed/26866593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610 Text en © 2016 Sheng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sheng, Sun-Ren Xu, Hua-Zi Wang, Yong-Li Zhu, Qing-An Mao, Fang-Min Lin, Yan Wang, Xiang-Yang Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title | Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title_full | Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title_short | Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans |
title_sort | comparison of cervical spine anatomy in calves, pigs and humans |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shengsunren comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT xuhuazi comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT wangyongli comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT zhuqingan comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT maofangmin comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT linyan comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans AT wangxiangyang comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans |