Cargando…

Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and huma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Sun-Ren, Xu, Hua-Zi, Wang, Yong-Li, Zhu, Qing-An, Mao, Fang-Min, Lin, Yan, Wang, Xiang-Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610
_version_ 1782415516003991552
author Sheng, Sun-Ren
Xu, Hua-Zi
Wang, Yong-Li
Zhu, Qing-An
Mao, Fang-Min
Lin, Yan
Wang, Xiang-Yang
author_facet Sheng, Sun-Ren
Xu, Hua-Zi
Wang, Yong-Li
Zhu, Qing-An
Mao, Fang-Min
Lin, Yan
Wang, Xiang-Yang
author_sort Sheng, Sun-Ren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported. PURPOSE: To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs). METHODS: Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD). RESULTS: The atlantoaxial (C1–2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4–C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute. CONCLUSION: Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47509862016-02-26 Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans Sheng, Sun-Ren Xu, Hua-Zi Wang, Yong-Li Zhu, Qing-An Mao, Fang-Min Lin, Yan Wang, Xiang-Yang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported. PURPOSE: To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs). METHODS: Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD). RESULTS: The atlantoaxial (C1–2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4–C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute. CONCLUSION: Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine. Public Library of Science 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4750986/ /pubmed/26866593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610 Text en © 2016 Sheng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sheng, Sun-Ren
Xu, Hua-Zi
Wang, Yong-Li
Zhu, Qing-An
Mao, Fang-Min
Lin, Yan
Wang, Xiang-Yang
Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title_full Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title_fullStr Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title_short Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans
title_sort comparison of cervical spine anatomy in calves, pigs and humans
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148610
work_keys_str_mv AT shengsunren comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT xuhuazi comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT wangyongli comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT zhuqingan comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT maofangmin comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT linyan comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans
AT wangxiangyang comparisonofcervicalspineanatomyincalvespigsandhumans