Cargando…

Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study

BACKGROUND: Is there evidence for expertise on collaboration and, if so, is there evidence for cross-domain application? Recall of stimuli was used to measure so-called internal collaboration scripts of novices and experts in two studies. Internal collaboration scripts refer to an individual’s knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiesewetter, Jan, Fischer, Frank, Fischer, Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148754
_version_ 1782415518018306048
author Kiesewetter, Jan
Fischer, Frank
Fischer, Martin R.
author_facet Kiesewetter, Jan
Fischer, Frank
Fischer, Martin R.
author_sort Kiesewetter, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Is there evidence for expertise on collaboration and, if so, is there evidence for cross-domain application? Recall of stimuli was used to measure so-called internal collaboration scripts of novices and experts in two studies. Internal collaboration scripts refer to an individual’s knowledge about how to interact with others in a social situation. METHOD—STUDY 1: Ten collaboration experts and ten novices of the content domain social science were presented with four pictures of people involved in collaborative activities. The recall texts were coded, distinguishing between superficial and collaboration script information. RESULTS—STUDY 1: Experts recalled significantly more collaboration script information (M = 25.20; SD = 5.88) than did novices (M = 13.80; SD = 4.47). Differences in superficial information were not found. STUDY 2: Study 2 tested whether the differences found in Study 1 could be replicated. Furthermore, the cross-domain application of internal collaboration scripts was explored. METHOD—STUDY 2: Twenty collaboration experts and 20 novices of the content domain medicine were presented with four pictures and four videos of their content domain and a video and picture of another content domain. All stimuli showed collaborative activities typical for the respective content domains. RESULTS—STUDY 2: As in Study 1, experts recalled significantly more collaboration script information of their content domain (M = 71.65; SD = 33.23) than did novices (M = 54.25; SD = 15.01). For the novices, no differences were found for the superficial information nor for the retrieval of collaboration script information recalled after the other content domain stimuli. DISCUSSION: There is evidence for expertise on collaboration in memory tasks. The results show that experts hold substantially more collaboration script information than did novices. Furthermore, the differences between collaboration novices and collaboration experts occurred only in their own content domain, indicating that internal collaboration scripts are not easily stored and retrieved in memory tasks other than in the own content domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4750995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47509952016-02-26 Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study Kiesewetter, Jan Fischer, Frank Fischer, Martin R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Is there evidence for expertise on collaboration and, if so, is there evidence for cross-domain application? Recall of stimuli was used to measure so-called internal collaboration scripts of novices and experts in two studies. Internal collaboration scripts refer to an individual’s knowledge about how to interact with others in a social situation. METHOD—STUDY 1: Ten collaboration experts and ten novices of the content domain social science were presented with four pictures of people involved in collaborative activities. The recall texts were coded, distinguishing between superficial and collaboration script information. RESULTS—STUDY 1: Experts recalled significantly more collaboration script information (M = 25.20; SD = 5.88) than did novices (M = 13.80; SD = 4.47). Differences in superficial information were not found. STUDY 2: Study 2 tested whether the differences found in Study 1 could be replicated. Furthermore, the cross-domain application of internal collaboration scripts was explored. METHOD—STUDY 2: Twenty collaboration experts and 20 novices of the content domain medicine were presented with four pictures and four videos of their content domain and a video and picture of another content domain. All stimuli showed collaborative activities typical for the respective content domains. RESULTS—STUDY 2: As in Study 1, experts recalled significantly more collaboration script information of their content domain (M = 71.65; SD = 33.23) than did novices (M = 54.25; SD = 15.01). For the novices, no differences were found for the superficial information nor for the retrieval of collaboration script information recalled after the other content domain stimuli. DISCUSSION: There is evidence for expertise on collaboration in memory tasks. The results show that experts hold substantially more collaboration script information than did novices. Furthermore, the differences between collaboration novices and collaboration experts occurred only in their own content domain, indicating that internal collaboration scripts are not easily stored and retrieved in memory tasks other than in the own content domain. Public Library of Science 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4750995/ /pubmed/26866801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148754 Text en © 2016 Kiesewetter et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiesewetter, Jan
Fischer, Frank
Fischer, Martin R.
Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title_full Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title_fullStr Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title_full_unstemmed Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title_short Collaboration Expertise in Medicine - No Evidence for Cross-Domain Application from a Memory Retrieval Study
title_sort collaboration expertise in medicine - no evidence for cross-domain application from a memory retrieval study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26866801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148754
work_keys_str_mv AT kiesewetterjan collaborationexpertiseinmedicinenoevidenceforcrossdomainapplicationfromamemoryretrievalstudy
AT fischerfrank collaborationexpertiseinmedicinenoevidenceforcrossdomainapplicationfromamemoryretrievalstudy
AT fischermartinr collaborationexpertiseinmedicinenoevidenceforcrossdomainapplicationfromamemoryretrievalstudy