Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review

Background and aim: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs may result in quality of care and outcome improvement. However, the implementation of such programs has proven to be very challenging. This mixed methods systematic review identifies barriers and facilitators pertaining to the impleme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Candas, Bernard, Jobin, Gilles, Dubé, Catherine, Tousignant, Mario, Abdeljelil, Anis Ben, Grenier, Sonya, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26878037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-107901
_version_ 1782415520554811392
author Candas, Bernard
Jobin, Gilles
Dubé, Catherine
Tousignant, Mario
Abdeljelil, Anis Ben
Grenier, Sonya
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
author_facet Candas, Bernard
Jobin, Gilles
Dubé, Catherine
Tousignant, Mario
Abdeljelil, Anis Ben
Grenier, Sonya
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
author_sort Candas, Bernard
collection PubMed
description Background and aim: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs may result in quality of care and outcome improvement. However, the implementation of such programs has proven to be very challenging. This mixed methods systematic review identifies barriers and facilitators pertaining to the implementation of CQI programs in colonoscopy services and how they relate to endoscopists, nurses, managers, and patients. Methods: We developed a search strategy adapted to 15 databases. Studies had to report on the implementation of a CQI intervention and identified barriers or facilitators relating to any of the four groups of actors directly concerned by the provision of colonoscopies. The quality of the selected studies was assessed and findings were extracted, categorized, and synthesized using a generic extraction grid customized through an iterative process. Results: We extracted 99 findings from the 15 selected publications. Although involving all actors is the most cited factor, the literature mainly focuses on the facilitators and barriers associated with the endoscopists’ perspective. The most reported facilitators to CQI implementation are perception of feasibility, adoption of a formative approach, training and education, confidentiality, and assessing a limited number of quality indicators. Receptive attitudes, a sense of ownership and perceptions of positive impacts also facilitate the implementation. Finally, an organizational environment conducive to quality improvement has to be inclusive of all user groups, explicitly supportive, and provide appropriate resources. Conclusion: Our findings corroborate the current models of adoption of innovations. However, a significant knowledge gap remains with respect to barriers and facilitators pertaining to nurses, patients, and managers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47510062016-02-12 Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review Candas, Bernard Jobin, Gilles Dubé, Catherine Tousignant, Mario Abdeljelil, Anis Ben Grenier, Sonya Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Endosc Int Open Article Background and aim: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs may result in quality of care and outcome improvement. However, the implementation of such programs has proven to be very challenging. This mixed methods systematic review identifies barriers and facilitators pertaining to the implementation of CQI programs in colonoscopy services and how they relate to endoscopists, nurses, managers, and patients. Methods: We developed a search strategy adapted to 15 databases. Studies had to report on the implementation of a CQI intervention and identified barriers or facilitators relating to any of the four groups of actors directly concerned by the provision of colonoscopies. The quality of the selected studies was assessed and findings were extracted, categorized, and synthesized using a generic extraction grid customized through an iterative process. Results: We extracted 99 findings from the 15 selected publications. Although involving all actors is the most cited factor, the literature mainly focuses on the facilitators and barriers associated with the endoscopists’ perspective. The most reported facilitators to CQI implementation are perception of feasibility, adoption of a formative approach, training and education, confidentiality, and assessing a limited number of quality indicators. Receptive attitudes, a sense of ownership and perceptions of positive impacts also facilitate the implementation. Finally, an organizational environment conducive to quality improvement has to be inclusive of all user groups, explicitly supportive, and provide appropriate resources. Conclusion: Our findings corroborate the current models of adoption of innovations. However, a significant knowledge gap remains with respect to barriers and facilitators pertaining to nurses, patients, and managers. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2016-02 2015-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4751006/ /pubmed/26878037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-107901 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Candas, Bernard
Jobin, Gilles
Dubé, Catherine
Tousignant, Mario
Abdeljelil, Anis Ben
Grenier, Sonya
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title_full Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title_short Barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
title_sort barriers and facilitators to implementing continuous quality improvement programs in colonoscopy services: a mixed methods systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26878037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-107901
work_keys_str_mv AT candasbernard barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT jobingilles barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT dubecatherine barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT tousignantmario barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT abdeljelilanisben barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT greniersonya barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT gagnonmariepierre barriersandfacilitatorstoimplementingcontinuousqualityimprovementprogramsincolonoscopyservicesamixedmethodssystematicreview