Cargando…

Do monkeys compare themselves to others?

Social comparisons are a fundamental characteristic of human behaviour, yet relatively little is known about their evolutionary foundations. Adapting the co-acting paradigm from human research (Seta in J Pers Soc Psychol 42:281–291, 1982. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.2.281), we examined how the perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitt, Vanessa, Federspiel, Ira, Eckert, Johanna, Keupp, Stefanie, Tschernek, Laura, Faraut, Lauriane, Schuster, Richard, Michels, Corinna, Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger, Bugnyar, Thomas, Mussweiler, Thomas, Fischer, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26615416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0943-4
_version_ 1782415540256505856
author Schmitt, Vanessa
Federspiel, Ira
Eckert, Johanna
Keupp, Stefanie
Tschernek, Laura
Faraut, Lauriane
Schuster, Richard
Michels, Corinna
Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger
Bugnyar, Thomas
Mussweiler, Thomas
Fischer, Julia
author_facet Schmitt, Vanessa
Federspiel, Ira
Eckert, Johanna
Keupp, Stefanie
Tschernek, Laura
Faraut, Lauriane
Schuster, Richard
Michels, Corinna
Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger
Bugnyar, Thomas
Mussweiler, Thomas
Fischer, Julia
author_sort Schmitt, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description Social comparisons are a fundamental characteristic of human behaviour, yet relatively little is known about their evolutionary foundations. Adapting the co-acting paradigm from human research (Seta in J Pers Soc Psychol 42:281–291, 1982. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.2.281), we examined how the performance of a partner influenced subjects’ performance in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Using parallel testing in touch screen setups in which subjects had to discriminate familiar and novel photographs of men and women, we investigated whether accuracy and reaction time were influenced by partner performance and relationship quality (affiliate vs. non-affiliate). Auditory feedback about the alleged performance of the co-actor was provided via playback; partner performance was either moderately or extremely better or worse than subject performance. We predicted that subjects would assimilate to moderately different comparison standards as well as to affiliates and contrast away from extreme standards and non-affiliates. Subjects instantly generalized to novel pictures. While accuracy was not affected by any of the factors, long reaction times occurred more frequently when subjects were tested with a non-affiliate who was performing worse, compared to one who was doing better than them (80 % quantile worse: 5.1, better: 4.3 s). For affiliate co-actors, there was no marked effect (worse: 4.4, better: 4.6 s). In a control condition with no auditory feedback, subjects performed somewhat better in the presence of affiliates (M = 77.8 % correct) compared to non-affiliates (M = 71.1 %), while reaction time was not affected. Apparently, subjects were sensitive to partner identity and performance, yet variation in motivation rather than assimilation and contrast effects may account for the observed effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0943-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47511612016-02-22 Do monkeys compare themselves to others? Schmitt, Vanessa Federspiel, Ira Eckert, Johanna Keupp, Stefanie Tschernek, Laura Faraut, Lauriane Schuster, Richard Michels, Corinna Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger Bugnyar, Thomas Mussweiler, Thomas Fischer, Julia Anim Cogn Original Paper Social comparisons are a fundamental characteristic of human behaviour, yet relatively little is known about their evolutionary foundations. Adapting the co-acting paradigm from human research (Seta in J Pers Soc Psychol 42:281–291, 1982. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.2.281), we examined how the performance of a partner influenced subjects’ performance in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Using parallel testing in touch screen setups in which subjects had to discriminate familiar and novel photographs of men and women, we investigated whether accuracy and reaction time were influenced by partner performance and relationship quality (affiliate vs. non-affiliate). Auditory feedback about the alleged performance of the co-actor was provided via playback; partner performance was either moderately or extremely better or worse than subject performance. We predicted that subjects would assimilate to moderately different comparison standards as well as to affiliates and contrast away from extreme standards and non-affiliates. Subjects instantly generalized to novel pictures. While accuracy was not affected by any of the factors, long reaction times occurred more frequently when subjects were tested with a non-affiliate who was performing worse, compared to one who was doing better than them (80 % quantile worse: 5.1, better: 4.3 s). For affiliate co-actors, there was no marked effect (worse: 4.4, better: 4.6 s). In a control condition with no auditory feedback, subjects performed somewhat better in the presence of affiliates (M = 77.8 % correct) compared to non-affiliates (M = 71.1 %), while reaction time was not affected. Apparently, subjects were sensitive to partner identity and performance, yet variation in motivation rather than assimilation and contrast effects may account for the observed effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10071-015-0943-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-28 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4751161/ /pubmed/26615416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0943-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Schmitt, Vanessa
Federspiel, Ira
Eckert, Johanna
Keupp, Stefanie
Tschernek, Laura
Faraut, Lauriane
Schuster, Richard
Michels, Corinna
Sennhenn-Reulen, Holger
Bugnyar, Thomas
Mussweiler, Thomas
Fischer, Julia
Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title_full Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title_fullStr Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title_full_unstemmed Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title_short Do monkeys compare themselves to others?
title_sort do monkeys compare themselves to others?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26615416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0943-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittvanessa domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT federspielira domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT eckertjohanna domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT keuppstefanie domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT tscherneklaura domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT farautlauriane domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT schusterrichard domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT michelscorinna domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT sennhennreulenholger domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT bugnyarthomas domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT mussweilerthomas domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers
AT fischerjulia domonkeyscomparethemselvestoothers