Cargando…

Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter

INTRODUCTION: A new artificial anal sphincter, SphinKeeper(TM), was devised with the aim to treat fecal incontinence (FI) by implanting specifically designed self-expandable prostheses into the intersphincteric space. Preliminary data concerning the procedure feasibility and prosthesis localization...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratto, C., Donisi, L., Litta, F., Campennì, P., Parello, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1396-0
_version_ 1782415540480901120
author Ratto, C.
Donisi, L.
Litta, F.
Campennì, P.
Parello, A.
author_facet Ratto, C.
Donisi, L.
Litta, F.
Campennì, P.
Parello, A.
author_sort Ratto, C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A new artificial anal sphincter, SphinKeeper(TM), was devised with the aim to treat fecal incontinence (FI) by implanting specifically designed self-expandable prostheses into the intersphincteric space. Preliminary data concerning the procedure feasibility and prosthesis localization at 3 months are presented. METHODS: SphinKeeper(TM) prostheses in the native state are dehydrated, thin, solid cylinder (length 29 mm, diameter 3 mm), changing their state (shorter—length 23 mm, thicker—diameter 7 mm—and softer, with shape memory) within 48 h of contact with fluids. In this study, 10 prostheses were implanted in each patient with FI under local anesthesia and under endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) guidance, into the upper-middle intersphincteric space of the anal canal by a specifically designed delivery system. EAUS was used postoperatively to assess prostheses dislocation. RESULTS: Ten patients (5 females; median age 58 years, range 20–75) were enrolled and treated with SphinKeeper(TM) implantation. Median duration of procedure (performed by endoanal ultrasound guidance) was 40 min (range 30–45). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were reported after a 3-month follow-up. In one patient, a partial dislocation of a single prosthesis was documented by EAUS, causing anal discomfort which resolved after 1 week. CONCLUSION: SphinKeeper(TM) can be safely implanted in patients with FI of different etiology. Implantation was well tolerated with no dislodgment of implants at 3-month follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47511622016-02-22 Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter Ratto, C. Donisi, L. Litta, F. Campennì, P. Parello, A. Tech Coloproctol Short Communication INTRODUCTION: A new artificial anal sphincter, SphinKeeper(TM), was devised with the aim to treat fecal incontinence (FI) by implanting specifically designed self-expandable prostheses into the intersphincteric space. Preliminary data concerning the procedure feasibility and prosthesis localization at 3 months are presented. METHODS: SphinKeeper(TM) prostheses in the native state are dehydrated, thin, solid cylinder (length 29 mm, diameter 3 mm), changing their state (shorter—length 23 mm, thicker—diameter 7 mm—and softer, with shape memory) within 48 h of contact with fluids. In this study, 10 prostheses were implanted in each patient with FI under local anesthesia and under endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) guidance, into the upper-middle intersphincteric space of the anal canal by a specifically designed delivery system. EAUS was used postoperatively to assess prostheses dislocation. RESULTS: Ten patients (5 females; median age 58 years, range 20–75) were enrolled and treated with SphinKeeper(TM) implantation. Median duration of procedure (performed by endoanal ultrasound guidance) was 40 min (range 30–45). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were reported after a 3-month follow-up. In one patient, a partial dislocation of a single prosthesis was documented by EAUS, causing anal discomfort which resolved after 1 week. CONCLUSION: SphinKeeper(TM) can be safely implanted in patients with FI of different etiology. Implantation was well tolerated with no dislodgment of implants at 3-month follow-up. Springer Milan 2015-12-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4751162/ /pubmed/26658726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1396-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2015
spellingShingle Short Communication
Ratto, C.
Donisi, L.
Litta, F.
Campennì, P.
Parello, A.
Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title_full Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title_fullStr Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title_full_unstemmed Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title_short Implantation of SphinKeeper(TM): a new artificial anal sphincter
title_sort implantation of sphinkeeper(tm): a new artificial anal sphincter
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1396-0
work_keys_str_mv AT rattoc implantationofsphinkeepertmanewartificialanalsphincter
AT donisil implantationofsphinkeepertmanewartificialanalsphincter
AT littaf implantationofsphinkeepertmanewartificialanalsphincter
AT campennip implantationofsphinkeepertmanewartificialanalsphincter
AT parelloa implantationofsphinkeepertmanewartificialanalsphincter