Cargando…
Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus
There has been concentrated debate over four decades as to whether or not the nonhuman primate parietal cortex codes for intention or attention. In nonhuman primates, certain studies report results consistent with an intentional role, whereas others provide support for coding of visual-spatial atten...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4507-2 |
_version_ | 1782415545658769408 |
---|---|
author | Connolly, Jason D. Kentridge, Robert W. Cavina-Pratesi, Cristiana |
author_facet | Connolly, Jason D. Kentridge, Robert W. Cavina-Pratesi, Cristiana |
author_sort | Connolly, Jason D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has been concentrated debate over four decades as to whether or not the nonhuman primate parietal cortex codes for intention or attention. In nonhuman primates, certain studies report results consistent with an intentional role, whereas others provide support for coding of visual-spatial attention. Until now, no one has yet directly contrasted an established motor “intention” paradigm with a verified “attention” paradigm within the same protocol. This debate has continued in both the nonhuman primate and healthy human brain and is subsequently timely. We incorporated both paradigms across two distinct temporal epochs within a whole-parietal slow event-related human functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment. This enabled us to examine whether or not one paradigm proves more effective at driving the neural response across three intraparietal areas. As participants performed saccadic eye and/or pointing tasks, discrete event-related components with dissociable responses were elicited in distinct sub-regions of human parietal cortex. Critically, the posterior intraparietal area showed robust activity consistent with attention (no intention planning). The most contentious area in the literature, the middle intraparietal area produced activation patterns that further reinforce attention coding in human parietal cortex. Finally, the anterior intraparietal area showed the same pattern. Therefore, distributed coding of attention is relatively more pronounced across the two computations within human parietal cortex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4751187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47511872016-02-22 Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus Connolly, Jason D. Kentridge, Robert W. Cavina-Pratesi, Cristiana Exp Brain Res Research Article There has been concentrated debate over four decades as to whether or not the nonhuman primate parietal cortex codes for intention or attention. In nonhuman primates, certain studies report results consistent with an intentional role, whereas others provide support for coding of visual-spatial attention. Until now, no one has yet directly contrasted an established motor “intention” paradigm with a verified “attention” paradigm within the same protocol. This debate has continued in both the nonhuman primate and healthy human brain and is subsequently timely. We incorporated both paradigms across two distinct temporal epochs within a whole-parietal slow event-related human functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment. This enabled us to examine whether or not one paradigm proves more effective at driving the neural response across three intraparietal areas. As participants performed saccadic eye and/or pointing tasks, discrete event-related components with dissociable responses were elicited in distinct sub-regions of human parietal cortex. Critically, the posterior intraparietal area showed robust activity consistent with attention (no intention planning). The most contentious area in the literature, the middle intraparietal area produced activation patterns that further reinforce attention coding in human parietal cortex. Finally, the anterior intraparietal area showed the same pattern. Therefore, distributed coding of attention is relatively more pronounced across the two computations within human parietal cortex. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-12-16 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4751187/ /pubmed/26677082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4507-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Connolly, Jason D. Kentridge, Robert W. Cavina-Pratesi, Cristiana Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title | Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title_full | Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title_fullStr | Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title_full_unstemmed | Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title_short | Coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
title_sort | coding of attention across the human intraparietal sulcus |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4507-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connollyjasond codingofattentionacrossthehumanintraparietalsulcus AT kentridgerobertw codingofattentionacrossthehumanintraparietalsulcus AT cavinapratesicristiana codingofattentionacrossthehumanintraparietalsulcus |