Cargando…

Outcome Knowledge and False Belief

Virtually every social interaction involves reasoning about the perspectives of others, or ‘theory of mind (ToM).’ Previous research suggests that it is difficult to ignore our current knowledge when reasoning about a more naïve perspective (i.e., the curse of knowledge). In this Mini Review, we dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghrear, Siba E., Birch, Susan A. J., Bernstein, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00118
_version_ 1782415565118242816
author Ghrear, Siba E.
Birch, Susan A. J.
Bernstein, Daniel M.
author_facet Ghrear, Siba E.
Birch, Susan A. J.
Bernstein, Daniel M.
author_sort Ghrear, Siba E.
collection PubMed
description Virtually every social interaction involves reasoning about the perspectives of others, or ‘theory of mind (ToM).’ Previous research suggests that it is difficult to ignore our current knowledge when reasoning about a more naïve perspective (i.e., the curse of knowledge). In this Mini Review, we discuss the implications of the curse of knowledge for certain aspects of ToM. Particularly, we examine how the curse of knowledge influences key measurements of false belief reasoning. In closing, we touch on the need to develop new measurement tools to discern the mechanisms involved in the curse of knowledge and false belief reasoning, and how they develop across the lifespan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47513032016-02-22 Outcome Knowledge and False Belief Ghrear, Siba E. Birch, Susan A. J. Bernstein, Daniel M. Front Psychol Psychology Virtually every social interaction involves reasoning about the perspectives of others, or ‘theory of mind (ToM).’ Previous research suggests that it is difficult to ignore our current knowledge when reasoning about a more naïve perspective (i.e., the curse of knowledge). In this Mini Review, we discuss the implications of the curse of knowledge for certain aspects of ToM. Particularly, we examine how the curse of knowledge influences key measurements of false belief reasoning. In closing, we touch on the need to develop new measurement tools to discern the mechanisms involved in the curse of knowledge and false belief reasoning, and how they develop across the lifespan. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4751303/ /pubmed/26903922 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00118 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ghrear, Birch and Bernstein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ghrear, Siba E.
Birch, Susan A. J.
Bernstein, Daniel M.
Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title_full Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title_fullStr Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title_full_unstemmed Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title_short Outcome Knowledge and False Belief
title_sort outcome knowledge and false belief
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903922
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00118
work_keys_str_mv AT ghrearsibae outcomeknowledgeandfalsebelief
AT birchsusanaj outcomeknowledgeandfalsebelief
AT bernsteindanielm outcomeknowledgeandfalsebelief