Cargando…

Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey

BACKGROUND: Madagascar, as other malaria endemic countries, depends mainly on international funding for the implementation of malaria control interventions (MCI). As these funds no longer increase, policy makers need to know whether these MCI actually provide the expected protection. This study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kesteman, Thomas, Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona, Raharimanga, Vaomalala, Randrianasolo, Laurence, Piola, Patrice, Rogier, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1132-x
_version_ 1782415643002273792
author Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Raharimanga, Vaomalala
Randrianasolo, Laurence
Piola, Patrice
Rogier, Christophe
author_facet Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Raharimanga, Vaomalala
Randrianasolo, Laurence
Piola, Patrice
Rogier, Christophe
author_sort Kesteman, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Madagascar, as other malaria endemic countries, depends mainly on international funding for the implementation of malaria control interventions (MCI). As these funds no longer increase, policy makers need to know whether these MCI actually provide the expected protection. This study aimed at measuring the effectiveness of MCI deployed in all transmission patterns of Madagascar in 2012–2013 against the occurrence of clinical malaria cases. METHODS: From September 2012 to August 2013, patients consulting for non-complicated malaria in 31 sentinel health centres (SHC) were asked to answer a short questionnaire about long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) use, indoor residual spraying (IRS) in the household and intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women (IPTp) intake. Controls were healthy all-ages individuals sampled from a concurrent cross-sectional survey conducted in areas surrounding the SHC. Cases and controls were retained in the database if they were resident of the same communes. The association between Plasmodium infection and exposure to MCI was calculated by multivariate multilevel models, and the protective effectiveness (PE) of an intervention was defined as 1 minus the odds ratio of this association. RESULTS: Data about 841 cases (out of 6760 cases observed in SHC) and 8284 controls was collected. The regular use of LLIN provided a significant 51 % PE (95 % CI [16–71]) in multivariate analysis, excluding in one transmission pattern where PE was −11 % (95 % CI [−251 to 65]) in univariate analysis. The PE of IRS was 51 % (95 % CI [31–65]), and the PE of exposure to both regular use of LLIN and IRS was 72 % (95 % CI [28–89]) in multivariate analyses. Vector control interventions avoided yearly over 100,000 clinical cases of malaria in Madagascar. The maternal PE of IPTp was 73 %. CONCLUSIONS: In Madagascar, LLIN and IRS had good PE against clinical malaria. These results may apply to other countries with similar transmission profiles, but such case–control surveys could be recommended to identify local failures in the effectiveness of MCI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1132-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47517522016-02-13 Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey Kesteman, Thomas Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona Raharimanga, Vaomalala Randrianasolo, Laurence Piola, Patrice Rogier, Christophe Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Madagascar, as other malaria endemic countries, depends mainly on international funding for the implementation of malaria control interventions (MCI). As these funds no longer increase, policy makers need to know whether these MCI actually provide the expected protection. This study aimed at measuring the effectiveness of MCI deployed in all transmission patterns of Madagascar in 2012–2013 against the occurrence of clinical malaria cases. METHODS: From September 2012 to August 2013, patients consulting for non-complicated malaria in 31 sentinel health centres (SHC) were asked to answer a short questionnaire about long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) use, indoor residual spraying (IRS) in the household and intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women (IPTp) intake. Controls were healthy all-ages individuals sampled from a concurrent cross-sectional survey conducted in areas surrounding the SHC. Cases and controls were retained in the database if they were resident of the same communes. The association between Plasmodium infection and exposure to MCI was calculated by multivariate multilevel models, and the protective effectiveness (PE) of an intervention was defined as 1 minus the odds ratio of this association. RESULTS: Data about 841 cases (out of 6760 cases observed in SHC) and 8284 controls was collected. The regular use of LLIN provided a significant 51 % PE (95 % CI [16–71]) in multivariate analysis, excluding in one transmission pattern where PE was −11 % (95 % CI [−251 to 65]) in univariate analysis. The PE of IRS was 51 % (95 % CI [31–65]), and the PE of exposure to both regular use of LLIN and IRS was 72 % (95 % CI [28–89]) in multivariate analyses. Vector control interventions avoided yearly over 100,000 clinical cases of malaria in Madagascar. The maternal PE of IPTp was 73 %. CONCLUSIONS: In Madagascar, LLIN and IRS had good PE against clinical malaria. These results may apply to other countries with similar transmission profiles, but such case–control surveys could be recommended to identify local failures in the effectiveness of MCI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1132-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4751752/ /pubmed/26867661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1132-x Text en © Kesteman et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kesteman, Thomas
Randrianarivelojosia, Milijaona
Raharimanga, Vaomalala
Randrianasolo, Laurence
Piola, Patrice
Rogier, Christophe
Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title_full Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title_fullStr Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title_short Effectiveness of malaria control interventions in Madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
title_sort effectiveness of malaria control interventions in madagascar: a nationwide case–control survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1132-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kestemanthomas effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey
AT randrianarivelojosiamilijaona effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey
AT raharimangavaomalala effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey
AT randrianasololaurence effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey
AT piolapatrice effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey
AT rogierchristophe effectivenessofmalariacontrolinterventionsinmadagascaranationwidecasecontrolsurvey