Cargando…

Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison

BACKGROUND: The non-rebreather mask (NRBM) is used for many applications and in many patient care scenarios in which hypoxemia and resultant hypoxia are a concern. The NRBM is a low-flow oxygen delivery system that is easily deployed and capable of delivering a relatively high fraction of inspired o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamb, Keith, Piper, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pulsus Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909009
_version_ 1782415658762371072
author Lamb, Keith
Piper, David
author_facet Lamb, Keith
Piper, David
author_sort Lamb, Keith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The non-rebreather mask (NRBM) is used for many applications and in many patient care scenarios in which hypoxemia and resultant hypoxia are a concern. The NRBM is a low-flow oxygen delivery system that is easily deployed and capable of delivering a relatively high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)).The potential for ineffective carbon dioxide (CO(2)) removal at low flow rates is a safety concern. OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that the use of an OxyMask (Southmedic Inc, Canada) would mitigate these safety concerns while still delivering a relatively high FiO(2). METHODS: Bench studies were performed in a third-party laboratory by qualified engineers (Piper Medical, USA). A Harvard Respirator Pump (Harvard Apparatus, USA), oxygen source, CO(2) source and a mannequin head were used to simulate varying respiratory conditions. End tidal CO(2) (EtCO(2)), FiO(2), fraction of inspired CO(2) and percent drop in CO(2) in the first second of exhalation were measured at different mask flow rates and respiratory rates. There were two categories of flow rates: high-flow (15 L/min) and low-flow (2 L/min). In each flow group, the above parameters were measured using a tidal volume of 400 mL, inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2, EtCO(2) of 5% and a breathing frequency of 15, 20 or 24 breaths/min. Mask performance measurements were obtained and compared. CONCLUSION: The OxyMask outperformed the traditional NRBM in each tested category. There was a higher inspired oxygen level, lower inspired CO(2) level, and more efficient CO(2) clearance at each mask flow level and simulated patient minute volume. This was especially true during conditions in which there were very low mask flow rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4751967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Pulsus Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47519672016-02-23 Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison Lamb, Keith Piper, David Can J Respir Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: The non-rebreather mask (NRBM) is used for many applications and in many patient care scenarios in which hypoxemia and resultant hypoxia are a concern. The NRBM is a low-flow oxygen delivery system that is easily deployed and capable of delivering a relatively high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)).The potential for ineffective carbon dioxide (CO(2)) removal at low flow rates is a safety concern. OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that the use of an OxyMask (Southmedic Inc, Canada) would mitigate these safety concerns while still delivering a relatively high FiO(2). METHODS: Bench studies were performed in a third-party laboratory by qualified engineers (Piper Medical, USA). A Harvard Respirator Pump (Harvard Apparatus, USA), oxygen source, CO(2) source and a mannequin head were used to simulate varying respiratory conditions. End tidal CO(2) (EtCO(2)), FiO(2), fraction of inspired CO(2) and percent drop in CO(2) in the first second of exhalation were measured at different mask flow rates and respiratory rates. There were two categories of flow rates: high-flow (15 L/min) and low-flow (2 L/min). In each flow group, the above parameters were measured using a tidal volume of 400 mL, inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2, EtCO(2) of 5% and a breathing frequency of 15, 20 or 24 breaths/min. Mask performance measurements were obtained and compared. CONCLUSION: The OxyMask outperformed the traditional NRBM in each tested category. There was a higher inspired oxygen level, lower inspired CO(2) level, and more efficient CO(2) clearance at each mask flow level and simulated patient minute volume. This was especially true during conditions in which there were very low mask flow rates. Pulsus Group Inc 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4751967/ /pubmed/26909009 Text en © 2016 Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. All rights reserved This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Lamb, Keith
Piper, David
Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title_full Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title_fullStr Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title_full_unstemmed Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title_short Southmedic OxyMask(TM) compared with the Hudson RCI(®) Non-Rebreather Mask(TM): Safety and performance comparison
title_sort southmedic oxymask(tm) compared with the hudson rci(®) non-rebreather mask(tm): safety and performance comparison
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4751967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909009
work_keys_str_mv AT lambkeith southmedicoxymasktmcomparedwiththehudsonrcinonrebreathermasktmsafetyandperformancecomparison
AT piperdavid southmedicoxymasktmcomparedwiththehudsonrcinonrebreathermasktmsafetyandperformancecomparison