Cargando…

Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To use meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of percutaneous core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of small renal masses (SMRs≤4.0 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database up to March 2013. Two of the authors indepe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Qiqi, Wang, Hanzhang, Kenyon, Jonathan, Liu, Guiming, Yang, Li, Tian, Junqiang, Yue, Zhongjin, Wang, Zhiping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.04
_version_ 1782415666086674432
author He, Qiqi
Wang, Hanzhang
Kenyon, Jonathan
Liu, Guiming
Yang, Li
Tian, Junqiang
Yue, Zhongjin
Wang, Zhiping
author_facet He, Qiqi
Wang, Hanzhang
Kenyon, Jonathan
Liu, Guiming
Yang, Li
Tian, Junqiang
Yue, Zhongjin
Wang, Zhiping
author_sort He, Qiqi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To use meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of percutaneous core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of small renal masses (SMRs≤4.0 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database up to March 2013. Two of the authors independently assessed the study quality using QUADAS-2 tool and extracted data that met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and also summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were investigated and draw. Deek’s funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies with 788 patients (803 biopsies) were included. Failed biopsies without repeated or aborted from follow-up/surgery result were excluded (232 patients and 353 biopsies). For all cases, the pooled sensitivity was 94.0% (95% CI: 91.0%, 95.0%), the pooled positive likelihood was 22.57 (95% CI: 9.20-55.34), the pooled negative likelihood was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.13), the pooled DOR was 296.52(95% CI: 99. 42-884.38). The area under the curve of SROC analysis was 0.959±0.0254. CONCLUSION: Imaging-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of small renal masses (SMRs≤4.0 cm) is highly accurate to malignant tumor diagnosis with unknown metastatic status and could be offered to some patients after clinic judgment prior to surgical intervention consideration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47520522016-05-09 Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis He, Qiqi Wang, Hanzhang Kenyon, Jonathan Liu, Guiming Yang, Li Tian, Junqiang Yue, Zhongjin Wang, Zhiping Int Braz J Urol Review Article OBJECTIVE: To use meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of percutaneous core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of small renal masses (SMRs≤4.0 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database up to March 2013. Two of the authors independently assessed the study quality using QUADAS-2 tool and extracted data that met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and also summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were investigated and draw. Deek’s funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias. RESULT: A total of 9 studies with 788 patients (803 biopsies) were included. Failed biopsies without repeated or aborted from follow-up/surgery result were excluded (232 patients and 353 biopsies). For all cases, the pooled sensitivity was 94.0% (95% CI: 91.0%, 95.0%), the pooled positive likelihood was 22.57 (95% CI: 9.20-55.34), the pooled negative likelihood was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.13), the pooled DOR was 296.52(95% CI: 99. 42-884.38). The area under the curve of SROC analysis was 0.959±0.0254. CONCLUSION: Imaging-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of small renal masses (SMRs≤4.0 cm) is highly accurate to malignant tumor diagnosis with unknown metastatic status and could be offered to some patients after clinic judgment prior to surgical intervention consideration. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4752052/ /pubmed/25928506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.04 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
He, Qiqi
Wang, Hanzhang
Kenyon, Jonathan
Liu, Guiming
Yang, Li
Tian, Junqiang
Yue, Zhongjin
Wang, Zhiping
Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of Percutaneous Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Small Renal Masses (≤4.0 cm): A Meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in the diagnosis of small renal masses (≤4.0 cm): a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.04
work_keys_str_mv AT heqiqi accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT wanghanzhang accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT kenyonjonathan accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT liuguiming accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT yangli accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT tianjunqiang accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT yuezhongjin accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis
AT wangzhiping accuracyofpercutaneouscorebiopsyinthediagnosisofsmallrenalmasses40cmametaanalysis