Cargando…

The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandee, Leah, Hsieh, Jer-Tsong, Sperandio, Vanessa, Moreira, Cristiano G., Lai, Chih-Ho, Zimmern, Philippe E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10
_version_ 1782415667451920384
author Gandee, Leah
Hsieh, Jer-Tsong
Sperandio, Vanessa
Moreira, Cristiano G.
Lai, Chih-Ho
Zimmern, Philippe E.
author_facet Gandee, Leah
Hsieh, Jer-Tsong
Sperandio, Vanessa
Moreira, Cristiano G.
Lai, Chih-Ho
Zimmern, Philippe E.
author_sort Gandee, Leah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. RESULTS: The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. CONCLUSION: When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47520582016-05-09 The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gandee, Leah Hsieh, Jer-Tsong Sperandio, Vanessa Moreira, Cristiano G. Lai, Chih-Ho Zimmern, Philippe E. Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. RESULTS: The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. CONCLUSION: When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4752058/ /pubmed/25928511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gandee, Leah
Hsieh, Jer-Tsong
Sperandio, Vanessa
Moreira, Cristiano G.
Lai, Chih-Ho
Zimmern, Philippe E.
The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic escherichia coli and pseudomonas aeruginosa
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10
work_keys_str_mv AT gandeeleah theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT hsiehjertsong theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT sperandiovanessa theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT moreiracristianog theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT laichihho theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT zimmernphilippee theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT gandeeleah efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT hsiehjertsong efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT sperandiovanessa efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT moreiracristianog efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT laichihho efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT zimmernphilippee efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa