Cargando…
The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10 |
_version_ | 1782415667451920384 |
---|---|
author | Gandee, Leah Hsieh, Jer-Tsong Sperandio, Vanessa Moreira, Cristiano G. Lai, Chih-Ho Zimmern, Philippe E. |
author_facet | Gandee, Leah Hsieh, Jer-Tsong Sperandio, Vanessa Moreira, Cristiano G. Lai, Chih-Ho Zimmern, Philippe E. |
author_sort | Gandee, Leah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. RESULTS: The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. CONCLUSION: When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4752058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47520582016-05-09 The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gandee, Leah Hsieh, Jer-Tsong Sperandio, Vanessa Moreira, Cristiano G. Lai, Chih-Ho Zimmern, Philippe E. Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. RESULTS: The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. CONCLUSION: When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4752058/ /pubmed/25928511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gandee, Leah Hsieh, Jer-Tsong Sperandio, Vanessa Moreira, Cristiano G. Lai, Chih-Ho Zimmern, Philippe E. The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title | The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_full | The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_short | The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
title_sort | efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic escherichia coli and pseudomonas aeruginosa |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gandeeleah theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT hsiehjertsong theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT sperandiovanessa theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT moreiracristianog theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT laichihho theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT zimmernphilippee theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT gandeeleah efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT hsiehjertsong efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT sperandiovanessa efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT moreiracristianog efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT laichihho efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa AT zimmernphilippee efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa |