Cargando…

Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 157 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porpiglia, Francesco, Russo, Filippo, Manfredi, Matteo, Mele, Fabrizio, Fiori, Cristian, Regge, Daniele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.17
_version_ 1782415669020590080
author Porpiglia, Francesco
Russo, Filippo
Manfredi, Matteo
Mele, Fabrizio
Fiori, Cristian
Regge, Daniele
author_facet Porpiglia, Francesco
Russo, Filippo
Manfredi, Matteo
Mele, Fabrizio
Fiori, Cristian
Regge, Daniele
author_sort Porpiglia, Francesco
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 157 patients with clinically localised PCa with a PSA <10 ng/mL and a negative DRE diagnosed on the first (12 samples, Group A) or second (18 samples, Group B) PB were enrolled at our institution. All patients underwent mp-MRI with T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI prior to RP. A map of comparison describing each positive biopsy sample was created for each patient, with each tumor focus shown on the MRI and each lesion present on the definitive histological examination in order to compare tumor detection and location. The sensitivity of mp-MRI and PB for diagnosis was compared using Student’s t-test. The ability of the two exams to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 in the identified lesions was compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to identify tumor lesion was 59.4% and 78.9%, respectively (p<0.0001). PB missed 144/355 lesions, 59 of which (16.6%) were significant. mp-MRI missed 75/355 lesions, 12 of which (3.4%) were significant. No lesions with a GS≥8 were missed. Sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 was 88.2% and 97.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: mp-MRI seems to identify more tumor lesions than PB and to provide more information concerning tumor characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47520652016-05-09 Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer Porpiglia, Francesco Russo, Filippo Manfredi, Matteo Mele, Fabrizio Fiori, Cristian Regge, Daniele Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 157 patients with clinically localised PCa with a PSA <10 ng/mL and a negative DRE diagnosed on the first (12 samples, Group A) or second (18 samples, Group B) PB were enrolled at our institution. All patients underwent mp-MRI with T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI prior to RP. A map of comparison describing each positive biopsy sample was created for each patient, with each tumor focus shown on the MRI and each lesion present on the definitive histological examination in order to compare tumor detection and location. The sensitivity of mp-MRI and PB for diagnosis was compared using Student’s t-test. The ability of the two exams to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 in the identified lesions was compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to identify tumor lesion was 59.4% and 78.9%, respectively (p<0.0001). PB missed 144/355 lesions, 59 of which (16.6%) were significant. mp-MRI missed 75/355 lesions, 12 of which (3.4%) were significant. No lesions with a GS≥8 were missed. Sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 was 88.2% and 97.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: mp-MRI seems to identify more tumor lesions than PB and to provide more information concerning tumor characteristics. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4752065/ /pubmed/25928518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.17 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Porpiglia, Francesco
Russo, Filippo
Manfredi, Matteo
Mele, Fabrizio
Fiori, Cristian
Regge, Daniele
Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_full Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_fullStr Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_short Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_sort preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.17
work_keys_str_mv AT porpigliafrancesco preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT russofilippo preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT manfredimatteo preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT melefabrizio preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT fioricristian preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT reggedaniele preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer