Cargando…
Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26005968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13 |
_version_ | 1782415674427047936 |
---|---|
author | Balasar, Mehmet Kandemir, Abdülkadir Poyraz, Necdet Unal, Yunus Ozturk, Ahmet |
author_facet | Balasar, Mehmet Kandemir, Abdülkadir Poyraz, Necdet Unal, Yunus Ozturk, Ahmet |
author_sort | Balasar, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. RESULTS: According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. CONCLUSIONS: PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4752090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47520902016-05-09 Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy Balasar, Mehmet Kandemir, Abdülkadir Poyraz, Necdet Unal, Yunus Ozturk, Ahmet Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. RESULTS: According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. CONCLUSIONS: PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4752090/ /pubmed/26005968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Balasar, Mehmet Kandemir, Abdülkadir Poyraz, Necdet Unal, Yunus Ozturk, Ahmet Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title | Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full | Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_fullStr | Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_short | Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
title_sort | incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26005968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balasarmehmet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT kandemirabdulkadir incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT poyraznecdet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT unalyunus incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy AT ozturkahmet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy |