Cargando…
In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260 |
_version_ | 1782415692476186624 |
---|---|
author | Varga-Szemes, Akos Kiss, Pal Rab, Andras Suranyi, Pal Lenkey, Zsofia Simor, Tamas Bryant, Robert G. Elgavish, Gabriel A. |
author_facet | Varga-Szemes, Akos Kiss, Pal Rab, Andras Suranyi, Pal Lenkey, Zsofia Simor, Tamas Bryant, Robert G. Elgavish, Gabriel A. |
author_sort | Varga-Szemes, Akos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental MRI CA, Gd(ABE-DTTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relaxivity of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) was measured by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) in the range of 0.0002 to 1T. Two MRI and five NMR instruments were used to cover the range between 1.5 to 20T. Parallel measurement of a Gd-DTPA sample was performed throughout as reference. All measurements were carried out at 37°C and pH 7.4. RESULTS: The relaxivity values of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured at 1.5, 3, and 7T, within the presently clinically relevant magnetic field range, were 15.3, 11.8, 12.4 s(-1)mM(-1) and 18.1, 16.7, and 13.5 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. The control 4 mM Gd-DTPA relaxivities at the same magnetic fields were 3.6, 3.3, and 3.0 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal relaxivity of Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured within the presently clinically relevant field range is three to five times higher than that of most commercially available agents. Thus, Gd(ABE-DTTA) could be a practical choice at any field strength currently used in clinical imaging including those at the higher end. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4752229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47522292016-02-26 In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Varga-Szemes, Akos Kiss, Pal Rab, Andras Suranyi, Pal Lenkey, Zsofia Simor, Tamas Bryant, Robert G. Elgavish, Gabriel A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental MRI CA, Gd(ABE-DTTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relaxivity of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) was measured by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) in the range of 0.0002 to 1T. Two MRI and five NMR instruments were used to cover the range between 1.5 to 20T. Parallel measurement of a Gd-DTPA sample was performed throughout as reference. All measurements were carried out at 37°C and pH 7.4. RESULTS: The relaxivity values of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured at 1.5, 3, and 7T, within the presently clinically relevant magnetic field range, were 15.3, 11.8, 12.4 s(-1)mM(-1) and 18.1, 16.7, and 13.5 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. The control 4 mM Gd-DTPA relaxivities at the same magnetic fields were 3.6, 3.3, and 3.0 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal relaxivity of Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured within the presently clinically relevant field range is three to five times higher than that of most commercially available agents. Thus, Gd(ABE-DTTA) could be a practical choice at any field strength currently used in clinical imaging including those at the higher end. Public Library of Science 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4752229/ /pubmed/26872055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260 Text en © 2016 Varga-Szemes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Varga-Szemes, Akos Kiss, Pal Rab, Andras Suranyi, Pal Lenkey, Zsofia Simor, Tamas Bryant, Robert G. Elgavish, Gabriel A. In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title | In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title_full | In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title_short | In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent |
title_sort | in vitro longitudinal relaxivity profile of gd(abe-dtta), an investigational magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vargaszemesakos invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT kisspal invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT rabandras invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT suranyipal invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT lenkeyzsofia invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT simortamas invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT bryantrobertg invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent AT elgavishgabriela invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent |