Cargando…

In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent

PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varga-Szemes, Akos, Kiss, Pal, Rab, Andras, Suranyi, Pal, Lenkey, Zsofia, Simor, Tamas, Bryant, Robert G., Elgavish, Gabriel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260
_version_ 1782415692476186624
author Varga-Szemes, Akos
Kiss, Pal
Rab, Andras
Suranyi, Pal
Lenkey, Zsofia
Simor, Tamas
Bryant, Robert G.
Elgavish, Gabriel A.
author_facet Varga-Szemes, Akos
Kiss, Pal
Rab, Andras
Suranyi, Pal
Lenkey, Zsofia
Simor, Tamas
Bryant, Robert G.
Elgavish, Gabriel A.
author_sort Varga-Szemes, Akos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental MRI CA, Gd(ABE-DTTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relaxivity of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) was measured by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) in the range of 0.0002 to 1T. Two MRI and five NMR instruments were used to cover the range between 1.5 to 20T. Parallel measurement of a Gd-DTPA sample was performed throughout as reference. All measurements were carried out at 37°C and pH 7.4. RESULTS: The relaxivity values of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured at 1.5, 3, and 7T, within the presently clinically relevant magnetic field range, were 15.3, 11.8, 12.4 s(-1)mM(-1) and 18.1, 16.7, and 13.5 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. The control 4 mM Gd-DTPA relaxivities at the same magnetic fields were 3.6, 3.3, and 3.0 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal relaxivity of Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured within the presently clinically relevant field range is three to five times higher than that of most commercially available agents. Thus, Gd(ABE-DTTA) could be a practical choice at any field strength currently used in clinical imaging including those at the higher end.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47522292016-02-26 In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Varga-Szemes, Akos Kiss, Pal Rab, Andras Suranyi, Pal Lenkey, Zsofia Simor, Tamas Bryant, Robert G. Elgavish, Gabriel A. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: MRI contrast agents (CA) whose contrast enhancement remains relatively high even at the higher end of the magnetic field strength range would be desirable. The purpose of this work was to demonstrate such a desired magnetic field dependency of the longitudinal relaxivity for an experimental MRI CA, Gd(ABE-DTTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relaxivity of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) was measured by Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) in the range of 0.0002 to 1T. Two MRI and five NMR instruments were used to cover the range between 1.5 to 20T. Parallel measurement of a Gd-DTPA sample was performed throughout as reference. All measurements were carried out at 37°C and pH 7.4. RESULTS: The relaxivity values of 0.5mM and 1mM Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured at 1.5, 3, and 7T, within the presently clinically relevant magnetic field range, were 15.3, 11.8, 12.4 s(-1)mM(-1) and 18.1, 16.7, and 13.5 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. The control 4 mM Gd-DTPA relaxivities at the same magnetic fields were 3.6, 3.3, and 3.0 s(-1)mM(-1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal relaxivity of Gd(ABE-DTTA) measured within the presently clinically relevant field range is three to five times higher than that of most commercially available agents. Thus, Gd(ABE-DTTA) could be a practical choice at any field strength currently used in clinical imaging including those at the higher end. Public Library of Science 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4752229/ /pubmed/26872055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260 Text en © 2016 Varga-Szemes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Varga-Szemes, Akos
Kiss, Pal
Rab, Andras
Suranyi, Pal
Lenkey, Zsofia
Simor, Tamas
Bryant, Robert G.
Elgavish, Gabriel A.
In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title_full In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title_fullStr In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title_short In Vitro Longitudinal Relaxivity Profile of Gd(ABE-DTTA), an Investigational Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent
title_sort in vitro longitudinal relaxivity profile of gd(abe-dtta), an investigational magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26872055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149260
work_keys_str_mv AT vargaszemesakos invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT kisspal invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT rabandras invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT suranyipal invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT lenkeyzsofia invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT simortamas invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT bryantrobertg invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent
AT elgavishgabriela invitrolongitudinalrelaxivityprofileofgdabedttaaninvestigationalmagneticresonanceimagingcontrastagent