Cargando…

Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles

Many species of fungi are closely allied with bark beetles, including many tree pathogens, but their species richness and patterns of distribution remain largely unknown. We established a protocol for metabarcoding of fungal communities directly from total genomic DNA extracted from individual beetl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Kirsten E., Hopkins, Kevin, Inward, Daegan J. G., Vogler, Alfried P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1925
_version_ 1782415719816757248
author Miller, Kirsten E.
Hopkins, Kevin
Inward, Daegan J. G.
Vogler, Alfried P.
author_facet Miller, Kirsten E.
Hopkins, Kevin
Inward, Daegan J. G.
Vogler, Alfried P.
author_sort Miller, Kirsten E.
collection PubMed
description Many species of fungi are closely allied with bark beetles, including many tree pathogens, but their species richness and patterns of distribution remain largely unknown. We established a protocol for metabarcoding of fungal communities directly from total genomic DNA extracted from individual beetles, showing that the ITS3/4 primer pair selectively amplifies the fungal ITS. Using three specimens of bark beetle from different species, we assess the fungal diversity associated with these specimens and the repeatability of these estimates in PCRs conducted with different primer tags. The combined replicates produced 727 fungal Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for the specimen of Hylastes ater, 435 OTUs for Tomicus piniperda, and 294 OTUs for Trypodendron lineatum, while individual PCR reactions produced on average only 229, 54, and 31 OTUs for the three specimens, respectively. Yet, communities from PCR replicates were very similar in pairwise comparisons, in particular when considering species abundance, but differed greatly among the three beetle specimens. Different primer tags or the inclusion of amplicons in separate libraries did not impact the species composition. The ITS2 sequences were identified with the Lowest Common Ancestor approach and correspond to diverse lineages of fungi, including Ophiostomaceae and Leotiomycetes widely found to be tree pathogens. We conclude that Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding reliably captures fungal diversity associated with bark beetles, although numerous PCR replicates are recommended for an exhaustive sample. Direct PCR from beetle DNA extractions provides a rapid method for future surveys of fungal species diversity and their associations with bark beetles and environmental variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47523642016-02-22 Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles Miller, Kirsten E. Hopkins, Kevin Inward, Daegan J. G. Vogler, Alfried P. Ecol Evol Original Research Many species of fungi are closely allied with bark beetles, including many tree pathogens, but their species richness and patterns of distribution remain largely unknown. We established a protocol for metabarcoding of fungal communities directly from total genomic DNA extracted from individual beetles, showing that the ITS3/4 primer pair selectively amplifies the fungal ITS. Using three specimens of bark beetle from different species, we assess the fungal diversity associated with these specimens and the repeatability of these estimates in PCRs conducted with different primer tags. The combined replicates produced 727 fungal Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for the specimen of Hylastes ater, 435 OTUs for Tomicus piniperda, and 294 OTUs for Trypodendron lineatum, while individual PCR reactions produced on average only 229, 54, and 31 OTUs for the three specimens, respectively. Yet, communities from PCR replicates were very similar in pairwise comparisons, in particular when considering species abundance, but differed greatly among the three beetle specimens. Different primer tags or the inclusion of amplicons in separate libraries did not impact the species composition. The ITS2 sequences were identified with the Lowest Common Ancestor approach and correspond to diverse lineages of fungi, including Ophiostomaceae and Leotiomycetes widely found to be tree pathogens. We conclude that Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding reliably captures fungal diversity associated with bark beetles, although numerous PCR replicates are recommended for an exhaustive sample. Direct PCR from beetle DNA extractions provides a rapid method for future surveys of fungal species diversity and their associations with bark beetles and environmental variables. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4752364/ /pubmed/26904186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1925 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Miller, Kirsten E.
Hopkins, Kevin
Inward, Daegan J. G.
Vogler, Alfried P.
Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title_full Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title_fullStr Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title_full_unstemmed Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title_short Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
title_sort metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26904186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1925
work_keys_str_mv AT millerkirstene metabarcodingoffungalcommunitiesassociatedwithbarkbeetles
AT hopkinskevin metabarcodingoffungalcommunitiesassociatedwithbarkbeetles
AT inwarddaeganjg metabarcodingoffungalcommunitiesassociatedwithbarkbeetles
AT vogleralfriedp metabarcodingoffungalcommunitiesassociatedwithbarkbeetles