Cargando…
Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas
Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management. This study assesses the quality of do...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209122.w3712 |
_version_ | 1782415774790451200 |
---|---|
author | Mahapatra, Piyush ieong, edmund |
author_facet | Mahapatra, Piyush ieong, edmund |
author_sort | Mahapatra, Piyush |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management. This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy, followed by an evaluation of the implementation of a novel operative proforma. A review of 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed for missing information, set against a standardised 30 point criteria. An operation proforma was then introduced, and a further 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed. We evaluated allied health professional satisfaction with a Likert point scale survey of 21 allied healthcare professionals (recovery and ward nurses, and physiotherapists) following introduction of the proforma. The mean number of missing items on a 30 point scale was 8.8 (range 0 to 23). Examination under anaesthesia was missed in 43% of cases, tourniquet time in 37% of cases, and wear results in 17% of cases. Following introduction of the proforma, the mean number of missing items was 1.1 (range 0 to 24; p <0.001). This rose to 3.8 after one year (p <0.001) before improvement to 0.7 (p <0.01) with a new and improved proforma. Eighty percent strongly agreed the operation note was clearer, 90% strongly agreed it was more legible, 90% strongly agreed it was more understandable, 50% strongly agreed there was more information recorded, and 100% strongly agreed on the proforma having been improved. Knee arthroscopy is a common procedure with large data sets, which can often be missed or incomplete. A standardised proforma results in a statistically significant improvement in documentation and reduces the incidence of missing information. They are subjectively clearer, more legible, and generally better compared with handwritten notes. This study demonstrates the improvements in healthcare documentation, both clinically and legally, following introduction of a simple proforma. This concept should be applicable to different specialities and procedures in healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4752707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47527072016-02-18 Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas Mahapatra, Piyush ieong, edmund BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management. This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy, followed by an evaluation of the implementation of a novel operative proforma. A review of 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed for missing information, set against a standardised 30 point criteria. An operation proforma was then introduced, and a further 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed. We evaluated allied health professional satisfaction with a Likert point scale survey of 21 allied healthcare professionals (recovery and ward nurses, and physiotherapists) following introduction of the proforma. The mean number of missing items on a 30 point scale was 8.8 (range 0 to 23). Examination under anaesthesia was missed in 43% of cases, tourniquet time in 37% of cases, and wear results in 17% of cases. Following introduction of the proforma, the mean number of missing items was 1.1 (range 0 to 24; p <0.001). This rose to 3.8 after one year (p <0.001) before improvement to 0.7 (p <0.01) with a new and improved proforma. Eighty percent strongly agreed the operation note was clearer, 90% strongly agreed it was more legible, 90% strongly agreed it was more understandable, 50% strongly agreed there was more information recorded, and 100% strongly agreed on the proforma having been improved. Knee arthroscopy is a common procedure with large data sets, which can often be missed or incomplete. A standardised proforma results in a statistically significant improvement in documentation and reduces the incidence of missing information. They are subjectively clearer, more legible, and generally better compared with handwritten notes. This study demonstrates the improvements in healthcare documentation, both clinically and legally, following introduction of a simple proforma. This concept should be applicable to different specialities and procedures in healthcare. British Publishing Group 2016-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4752707/ /pubmed/26893892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209122.w3712 Text en © 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Mahapatra, Piyush ieong, edmund Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title | Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title_full | Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title_fullStr | Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title_short | Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas |
title_sort | improving documentation and communication using operative note proformas |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u209122.w3712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahapatrapiyush improvingdocumentationandcommunicationusingoperativenoteproformas AT ieongedmund improvingdocumentationandcommunicationusingoperativenoteproformas |