Cargando…
Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients
The Tracey Report has recently raised the status of Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders in the hospital setting.[1] Guidelines are in place both nationally and locally to provide advice to clinicians on when to discuss DNACPR, and the approach to be taken. There was concern...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206293.w3610 |
_version_ | 1782415776169328640 |
---|---|
author | McIntosh, Rachel Webb, Hannah Hartley, Matthew Brooks, Marcus |
author_facet | McIntosh, Rachel Webb, Hannah Hartley, Matthew Brooks, Marcus |
author_sort | McIntosh, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Tracey Report has recently raised the status of Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders in the hospital setting.[1] Guidelines are in place both nationally and locally to provide advice to clinicians on when to discuss DNACPR, and the approach to be taken. There was concern that on a busy regional vascular surgery unit, discussion of resuscitation status was not regular practice. Consequently, some patients were at risk of being inappropriately resuscitated, particularly out of hours. The North Bristol Somerset and Gloucester DNAR decision tree[2] was the tool used to decide whether a patient should have a documented discussion and/or a DNACPR form completed. We correlated the outcome of the decision tree with the presence of a DNACPR form or documented resuscitation discussion. Baseline measurements from all vascular inpatients on the vascular surgery unit demonstrated that only 27% had a DNACPR form or documented discussion in concordance with the DNACPR Decision Tree outcome. The aim of this project was to increase the proportion of patients with concordance of the DNACPR decision tree outcome with documented discussion or DNACPR form. The following three simple interventions raised concordance from 27% to 64% of patients on the vascular surgery unit. 1. Including resuscitation status of each patient as a column in the doctors daily handover. 2. Posters in staff only areas to highlight the meaning of DNACPR and raise awareness of the DNACPR decision tree. 3. Educational meeting surrounding DNACPR with the vascular surgery consultants, led by a care of the elderly consultant . This project has highlighted how raising awareness around DNACPR increases discussion amongst the clinical team surrounding resuscitation status of a patient. Consequently, this enables discussion to be had with patient and their family. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4752713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47527132016-02-18 Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients McIntosh, Rachel Webb, Hannah Hartley, Matthew Brooks, Marcus BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme The Tracey Report has recently raised the status of Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders in the hospital setting.[1] Guidelines are in place both nationally and locally to provide advice to clinicians on when to discuss DNACPR, and the approach to be taken. There was concern that on a busy regional vascular surgery unit, discussion of resuscitation status was not regular practice. Consequently, some patients were at risk of being inappropriately resuscitated, particularly out of hours. The North Bristol Somerset and Gloucester DNAR decision tree[2] was the tool used to decide whether a patient should have a documented discussion and/or a DNACPR form completed. We correlated the outcome of the decision tree with the presence of a DNACPR form or documented resuscitation discussion. Baseline measurements from all vascular inpatients on the vascular surgery unit demonstrated that only 27% had a DNACPR form or documented discussion in concordance with the DNACPR Decision Tree outcome. The aim of this project was to increase the proportion of patients with concordance of the DNACPR decision tree outcome with documented discussion or DNACPR form. The following three simple interventions raised concordance from 27% to 64% of patients on the vascular surgery unit. 1. Including resuscitation status of each patient as a column in the doctors daily handover. 2. Posters in staff only areas to highlight the meaning of DNACPR and raise awareness of the DNACPR decision tree. 3. Educational meeting surrounding DNACPR with the vascular surgery consultants, led by a care of the elderly consultant . This project has highlighted how raising awareness around DNACPR increases discussion amongst the clinical team surrounding resuscitation status of a patient. Consequently, this enables discussion to be had with patient and their family. British Publishing Group 2016-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4752713/ /pubmed/26893897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206293.w3610 Text en © 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme McIntosh, Rachel Webb, Hannah Hartley, Matthew Brooks, Marcus Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title | Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title_full | Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title_fullStr | Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title_short | Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients |
title_sort | raising the issue of dnar orders in vascular surgery patients |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u206293.w3610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcintoshrachel raisingtheissueofdnarordersinvascularsurgerypatients AT webbhannah raisingtheissueofdnarordersinvascularsurgerypatients AT hartleymatthew raisingtheissueofdnarordersinvascularsurgerypatients AT brooksmarcus raisingtheissueofdnarordersinvascularsurgerypatients |