Cargando…
The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
BACKGROUND: Blinding is a pivotal method to avoid bias in randomised clinical trials. In blinded drug trials, experimental and control interventions are often designed to be matched, i.e. to appear indistinguishable. It is unknown how often matching procedures are inadequate, so we decided to system...
Autores principales: | Bello, Segun, Wei, Maoling, Hilden, Jørgen, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0111-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
por: Olsen, Mette Frahm, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention
por: Krogsbøll, Lasse Theis, et al.
Publicado: (2009)