Cargando…

Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary

Healthcare workers are now being targeted for marketing of diagnostic tools for mastitis that were developed for the dairy industry and which aim to provide information regarding choice of antibiotic treatment. Meanwhile, scientists are striving to understand how the human microbiome affects health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kvist, Linda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0061-1
_version_ 1782415784479293440
author Kvist, Linda J.
author_facet Kvist, Linda J.
author_sort Kvist, Linda J.
collection PubMed
description Healthcare workers are now being targeted for marketing of diagnostic tools for mastitis that were developed for the dairy industry and which aim to provide information regarding choice of antibiotic treatment. Meanwhile, scientists are striving to understand how the human microbiome affects health and wellbeing and the importance of maintenance of bacterial balance in the human body. Breast milk supplies a multitude of bacteria to populate the baby’s intestinal tract and kick-start the immune system. Researchers propose a paradigm shift in the understanding of bacterial content in breast milk and an alternative paradigm for the understanding of lactational mastitis: there is the beginning of evidence that many cases of lactational mastitis will resolve spontaneously. An international group of researchers is attempting to answer how dietary habits, birth mode, genetics and environmental factors may impact the bacterial content of breast milk. Until we have more comprehensive knowledge about the human milk microbiome, diagnostic aids for identification of women in need of antibiotic therapy for mastitis remain unreliable. Diagnostic aids could lead to the injudicious use of antibiotic therapy, which in turn may rob the infant of bacteria valuable for development of its immune system. The marketing of diagnostic aids for use in human medicine, that were originally developed for use in cows, is neither evidence-based nor good ethical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4752757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47527572016-02-14 Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary Kvist, Linda J. Int Breastfeed J Commentary Healthcare workers are now being targeted for marketing of diagnostic tools for mastitis that were developed for the dairy industry and which aim to provide information regarding choice of antibiotic treatment. Meanwhile, scientists are striving to understand how the human microbiome affects health and wellbeing and the importance of maintenance of bacterial balance in the human body. Breast milk supplies a multitude of bacteria to populate the baby’s intestinal tract and kick-start the immune system. Researchers propose a paradigm shift in the understanding of bacterial content in breast milk and an alternative paradigm for the understanding of lactational mastitis: there is the beginning of evidence that many cases of lactational mastitis will resolve spontaneously. An international group of researchers is attempting to answer how dietary habits, birth mode, genetics and environmental factors may impact the bacterial content of breast milk. Until we have more comprehensive knowledge about the human milk microbiome, diagnostic aids for identification of women in need of antibiotic therapy for mastitis remain unreliable. Diagnostic aids could lead to the injudicious use of antibiotic therapy, which in turn may rob the infant of bacteria valuable for development of its immune system. The marketing of diagnostic aids for use in human medicine, that were originally developed for use in cows, is neither evidence-based nor good ethical practice. BioMed Central 2016-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4752757/ /pubmed/26877759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0061-1 Text en © Kvist. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Kvist, Linda J.
Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title_full Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title_fullStr Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title_short Diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
title_sort diagnostic methods for mastitis in cows are not appropriate for use in humans: commentary
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4752757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26877759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13006-016-0061-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kvistlindaj diagnosticmethodsformastitisincowsarenotappropriateforuseinhumanscommentary