Cargando…
The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis
Background and aims. All-on-four technique involves the use of tilted implants to allow for shorter cantilevers. This finite element analysis aimed at investigating the amount and distribution of stress in maxillary bone surrounding the implants with all-on-four vs. frequently used method with six i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26889362 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2015.044 |
_version_ | 1782415822877097984 |
---|---|
author | Saleh Saber, Fariba Ghasemi, Shima Koodaryan, Rodabeh Babaloo, Amirreza Abolfazli, Nader |
author_facet | Saleh Saber, Fariba Ghasemi, Shima Koodaryan, Rodabeh Babaloo, Amirreza Abolfazli, Nader |
author_sort | Saleh Saber, Fariba |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims. All-on-four technique involves the use of tilted implants to allow for shorter cantilevers. This finite element analysis aimed at investigating the amount and distribution of stress in maxillary bone surrounding the implants with all-on-four vs. frequently used method with six implants technique using different numbers and inclination angles. Materials and methods. A 3D edentulous maxillary model was created and implants were virtually placed anterior to the maxillary sinus and splinted with a superstructure. In total, five models were designed. In the first to the fourth models, four implants were placed with distal implants inclined 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. In the fifth model, six vertical implants were placed. 100 N loading was placed in the left most distal region of the superstructure. Maximum von Mises stress values were evaluated in cancellous and cortical bone. Results. The maximum stress values recorded in cancellous and cortical bone were 7.15 MPa and 51.69 MPa, respectively (model I). The reduction in stress values in models II to V 6%, 18%, 54%, and 24% in cancellous bone and 12%, 36%,62%, and 62% in cortical bone, respectively. Conclusion. Increasing the inclination in posterior implants resulted in reduction of cantilever length and maximum stress decline in both cancellous and cortical bone. The effect of cantilever length seems to be a dominant factor which can diminish stress even with less number of implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4753034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47530342016-02-17 The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis Saleh Saber, Fariba Ghasemi, Shima Koodaryan, Rodabeh Babaloo, Amirreza Abolfazli, Nader J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Research Background and aims. All-on-four technique involves the use of tilted implants to allow for shorter cantilevers. This finite element analysis aimed at investigating the amount and distribution of stress in maxillary bone surrounding the implants with all-on-four vs. frequently used method with six implants technique using different numbers and inclination angles. Materials and methods. A 3D edentulous maxillary model was created and implants were virtually placed anterior to the maxillary sinus and splinted with a superstructure. In total, five models were designed. In the first to the fourth models, four implants were placed with distal implants inclined 0, 15, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. In the fifth model, six vertical implants were placed. 100 N loading was placed in the left most distal region of the superstructure. Maximum von Mises stress values were evaluated in cancellous and cortical bone. Results. The maximum stress values recorded in cancellous and cortical bone were 7.15 MPa and 51.69 MPa, respectively (model I). The reduction in stress values in models II to V 6%, 18%, 54%, and 24% in cancellous bone and 12%, 36%,62%, and 62% in cortical bone, respectively. Conclusion. Increasing the inclination in posterior implants resulted in reduction of cantilever length and maximum stress decline in both cancellous and cortical bone. The effect of cantilever length seems to be a dominant factor which can diminish stress even with less number of implants. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2015 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4753034/ /pubmed/26889362 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2015.044 Text en © 2015 by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Saleh Saber, Fariba Ghasemi, Shima Koodaryan, Rodabeh Babaloo, Amirreza Abolfazli, Nader The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title | The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_full | The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_short | The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of stress distribution with different implant numbers and inclination angles in all-on-four and conventional methods in maxilla: a finite element analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26889362 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2015.044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salehsaberfariba thecomparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT ghasemishima thecomparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT koodaryanrodabeh thecomparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT babalooamirreza thecomparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT abolfazlinader thecomparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT salehsaberfariba comparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT ghasemishima comparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT koodaryanrodabeh comparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT babalooamirreza comparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis AT abolfazlinader comparisonofstressdistributionwithdifferentimplantnumbersandinclinationanglesinallonfourandconventionalmethodsinmaxillaafiniteelementanalysis |