Cargando…

RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT

AIM: To determine the rural–urban differences in primary care practice, hospital inpatient care and total services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from Zenica-Doboj Canton in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH). The overall sample size for the study was 1,995. Individual inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spasojevic, Nada, Vasilj, Ivan, Hrabac, Boris, Celik, Damir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937222
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.409-411
_version_ 1782415852893634560
author Spasojevic, Nada
Vasilj, Ivan
Hrabac, Boris
Celik, Damir
author_facet Spasojevic, Nada
Vasilj, Ivan
Hrabac, Boris
Celik, Damir
author_sort Spasojevic, Nada
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine the rural–urban differences in primary care practice, hospital inpatient care and total services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from Zenica-Doboj Canton in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH). The overall sample size for the study was 1,995. Individual interviews were conducted in one randomly selected day of the week, except Monday and Friday, on the basis of EUROPEP (European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care) standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of total number (n=1 995), 47.9% was urban population and median of age was 42 years for both populations. The most of urban residents (81.4%) had finished high school or higher education compared with rural residents (58.5%) (p < 0.001). There are significant differences in employment status between rural and urban population (p < 0.001). Rural residents are more likely to travel more than 15 minutes to see their health facilities compared with urban residents (61.7% vs. 24.4%, respectively). Median of distance (kilometers) from residence location to the nearest hospital was statistically significantly higher in rural Me = 8.0 (5.0 do 14.5) km compared to urban population Me = 1.5 (1.0 to 3.0) km (p < 0.001). The rural population was more likely to buy drugs for medical treatment (p < 0.001) and parenteral injections in primary care practice (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the overall health care assessment of rural populations as compared to urban populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4753384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47533842016-03-02 RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT Spasojevic, Nada Vasilj, Ivan Hrabac, Boris Celik, Damir Mater Sociomed Original Paper AIM: To determine the rural–urban differences in primary care practice, hospital inpatient care and total services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from Zenica-Doboj Canton in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH). The overall sample size for the study was 1,995. Individual interviews were conducted in one randomly selected day of the week, except Monday and Friday, on the basis of EUROPEP (European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care) standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of total number (n=1 995), 47.9% was urban population and median of age was 42 years for both populations. The most of urban residents (81.4%) had finished high school or higher education compared with rural residents (58.5%) (p < 0.001). There are significant differences in employment status between rural and urban population (p < 0.001). Rural residents are more likely to travel more than 15 minutes to see their health facilities compared with urban residents (61.7% vs. 24.4%, respectively). Median of distance (kilometers) from residence location to the nearest hospital was statistically significantly higher in rural Me = 8.0 (5.0 do 14.5) km compared to urban population Me = 1.5 (1.0 to 3.0) km (p < 0.001). The rural population was more likely to buy drugs for medical treatment (p < 0.001) and parenteral injections in primary care practice (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the overall health care assessment of rural populations as compared to urban populations. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4753384/ /pubmed/26937222 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.409-411 Text en Copyright: © Nada Spasojevic, Ivan Vasilj, Boris Hrabac, Damir Celik http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Spasojevic, Nada
Vasilj, Ivan
Hrabac, Boris
Celik, Damir
RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title_full RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title_fullStr RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title_full_unstemmed RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title_short RURAL – URBAN DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT
title_sort rural – urban differences in health care quality assessment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937222
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/msm.2015.27.409-411
work_keys_str_mv AT spasojevicnada ruralurbandifferencesinhealthcarequalityassessment
AT vasiljivan ruralurbandifferencesinhealthcarequalityassessment
AT hrabacboris ruralurbandifferencesinhealthcarequalityassessment
AT celikdamir ruralurbandifferencesinhealthcarequalityassessment