Cargando…

Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial

We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lei, Xiao, Zhibo, Yue, Zhendong, Zhao, Hongwei, Fan, Zhenhua, Zhao, Mengfei, He, Fuliang, Dai, Shan, Qiu, Bin, Yao, Jiannan, Lin, Qiushi, Dong, Xiaoqun, Liu, Fuquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011
_version_ 1782415869459038208
author Wang, Lei
Xiao, Zhibo
Yue, Zhendong
Zhao, Hongwei
Fan, Zhenhua
Zhao, Mengfei
He, Fuliang
Dai, Shan
Qiu, Bin
Yao, Jiannan
Lin, Qiushi
Dong, Xiaoqun
Liu, Fuquan
author_facet Wang, Lei
Xiao, Zhibo
Yue, Zhendong
Zhao, Hongwei
Fan, Zhenhua
Zhao, Mengfei
He, Fuliang
Dai, Shan
Qiu, Bin
Yao, Jiannan
Lin, Qiushi
Dong, Xiaoqun
Liu, Fuquan
author_sort Wang, Lei
collection PubMed
description We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control group) was used in 131 and 127 patients, respectively. The recurrence rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (18.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.004) and refractory hydrothorax/ascites (6.9% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.019) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The cumulative restenosis rates in 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-years in the experimental group (6.9%, 11.5%, 19.1%, 26.0%, and 35.9%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those in the control group (27.6%, 37.0%, 49.6%, 59.8%, 74.8%, respectively). Importantly, the 4 and 5-year survival rates in the experimental group (83.2% and 76.3%, respectively) were significantly higher (P = 0.001 and 0.02) than those in the control group (71.7% and 62.2%, respectively). The rate of secondary interventional therapy in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.6% vs. 49.6%; P < 0.001). Therefore, Fluency covered stent has advantages over the bare stent in terms of reducing the restenosis, recurrence, and secondary interventional therapy, whereas improving the long-term survival for post-TIPS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4753460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47534602016-02-23 Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial Wang, Lei Xiao, Zhibo Yue, Zhendong Zhao, Hongwei Fan, Zhenhua Zhao, Mengfei He, Fuliang Dai, Shan Qiu, Bin Yao, Jiannan Lin, Qiushi Dong, Xiaoqun Liu, Fuquan Sci Rep Article We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control group) was used in 131 and 127 patients, respectively. The recurrence rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (18.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.004) and refractory hydrothorax/ascites (6.9% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.019) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The cumulative restenosis rates in 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-years in the experimental group (6.9%, 11.5%, 19.1%, 26.0%, and 35.9%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those in the control group (27.6%, 37.0%, 49.6%, 59.8%, 74.8%, respectively). Importantly, the 4 and 5-year survival rates in the experimental group (83.2% and 76.3%, respectively) were significantly higher (P = 0.001 and 0.02) than those in the control group (71.7% and 62.2%, respectively). The rate of secondary interventional therapy in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.6% vs. 49.6%; P < 0.001). Therefore, Fluency covered stent has advantages over the bare stent in terms of reducing the restenosis, recurrence, and secondary interventional therapy, whereas improving the long-term survival for post-TIPS patients. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4753460/ /pubmed/26876503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Lei
Xiao, Zhibo
Yue, Zhendong
Zhao, Hongwei
Fan, Zhenhua
Zhao, Mengfei
He, Fuliang
Dai, Shan
Qiu, Bin
Yao, Jiannan
Lin, Qiushi
Dong, Xiaoqun
Liu, Fuquan
Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title_full Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title_short Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
title_sort efficacy of covered and bare stent in tips for cirrhotic portal hypertension: a single-center randomized trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT xiaozhibo efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT yuezhendong efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT zhaohongwei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT fanzhenhua efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT zhaomengfei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT hefuliang efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT daishan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT qiubin efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT yaojiannan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT linqiushi efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT dongxiaoqun efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial
AT liufuquan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial