Cargando…
Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial
We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011 |
_version_ | 1782415869459038208 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lei Xiao, Zhibo Yue, Zhendong Zhao, Hongwei Fan, Zhenhua Zhao, Mengfei He, Fuliang Dai, Shan Qiu, Bin Yao, Jiannan Lin, Qiushi Dong, Xiaoqun Liu, Fuquan |
author_facet | Wang, Lei Xiao, Zhibo Yue, Zhendong Zhao, Hongwei Fan, Zhenhua Zhao, Mengfei He, Fuliang Dai, Shan Qiu, Bin Yao, Jiannan Lin, Qiushi Dong, Xiaoqun Liu, Fuquan |
author_sort | Wang, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control group) was used in 131 and 127 patients, respectively. The recurrence rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (18.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.004) and refractory hydrothorax/ascites (6.9% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.019) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The cumulative restenosis rates in 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-years in the experimental group (6.9%, 11.5%, 19.1%, 26.0%, and 35.9%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those in the control group (27.6%, 37.0%, 49.6%, 59.8%, 74.8%, respectively). Importantly, the 4 and 5-year survival rates in the experimental group (83.2% and 76.3%, respectively) were significantly higher (P = 0.001 and 0.02) than those in the control group (71.7% and 62.2%, respectively). The rate of secondary interventional therapy in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.6% vs. 49.6%; P < 0.001). Therefore, Fluency covered stent has advantages over the bare stent in terms of reducing the restenosis, recurrence, and secondary interventional therapy, whereas improving the long-term survival for post-TIPS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4753460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47534602016-02-23 Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial Wang, Lei Xiao, Zhibo Yue, Zhendong Zhao, Hongwei Fan, Zhenhua Zhao, Mengfei He, Fuliang Dai, Shan Qiu, Bin Yao, Jiannan Lin, Qiushi Dong, Xiaoqun Liu, Fuquan Sci Rep Article We conducted a single-center randomized trial to compare the efficacy of 8 mm Fluency covered stent and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension. From January 2006 to December 2010, the covered (experimental group) or bare stent (control group) was used in 131 and 127 patients, respectively. The recurrence rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (18.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.004) and refractory hydrothorax/ascites (6.9% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.019) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The cumulative restenosis rates in 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-years in the experimental group (6.9%, 11.5%, 19.1%, 26.0%, and 35.9%, respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than those in the control group (27.6%, 37.0%, 49.6%, 59.8%, 74.8%, respectively). Importantly, the 4 and 5-year survival rates in the experimental group (83.2% and 76.3%, respectively) were significantly higher (P = 0.001 and 0.02) than those in the control group (71.7% and 62.2%, respectively). The rate of secondary interventional therapy in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (20.6% vs. 49.6%; P < 0.001). Therefore, Fluency covered stent has advantages over the bare stent in terms of reducing the restenosis, recurrence, and secondary interventional therapy, whereas improving the long-term survival for post-TIPS patients. Nature Publishing Group 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4753460/ /pubmed/26876503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Lei Xiao, Zhibo Yue, Zhendong Zhao, Hongwei Fan, Zhenhua Zhao, Mengfei He, Fuliang Dai, Shan Qiu, Bin Yao, Jiannan Lin, Qiushi Dong, Xiaoqun Liu, Fuquan Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title | Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title_full | Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title_short | Efficacy of covered and bare stent in TIPS for cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single-center randomized trial |
title_sort | efficacy of covered and bare stent in tips for cirrhotic portal hypertension: a single-center randomized trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep21011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT xiaozhibo efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT yuezhendong efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT zhaohongwei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT fanzhenhua efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT zhaomengfei efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT hefuliang efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT daishan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT qiubin efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT yaojiannan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT linqiushi efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT dongxiaoqun efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial AT liufuquan efficacyofcoveredandbarestentintipsforcirrhoticportalhypertensionasinglecenterrandomizedtrial |