Cargando…
Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility stu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x |
_version_ | 1782415892381958144 |
---|---|
author | Huber, Daniel Henriksson, Robin Jakobsson, Stina Stenfors, Nikolai Mooe, Thomas |
author_facet | Huber, Daniel Henriksson, Robin Jakobsson, Stina Stenfors, Nikolai Mooe, Thomas |
author_sort | Huber, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility study of a telephone-based secondary preventive programme in an unselected ACS cohort. METHODS: The NAILED (Nurse-based Age-independent Intervention to Limit Evolution of Disease) ACS trial is a prospective randomized controlled trial. All eligible patients admitted for ACS were randomized to usual follow-up by a general practitioner or telephone follow-up by study nurses. The intervention was made by continuous telephone contact, with counseling on healthy living and titration of medicines to reach target values for blood pressure and blood lipids. Exclusion criteria were limited to physical inability to follow the study design or participation in another study. RESULTS: A total of 907 patients were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 661 (72.9 %) were included and randomized, 100 (11 %) declined participation, and 146 (16.1 %) were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were participation in another trial, dementia, and advanced disease. “Excluded” and “declining” patients were significantly older with more co-morbidity, decreased functional status, and had more seldom received education above compulsory school level than “included” patients. Non-participants had a higher 1-year mortality than participants. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up after ACS can be applied to a large proportion in an unselected clinical setting. Reasons for non-participation, which were associated with increased mortality, include older age, multiple co-morbidities, decreased functional status and low level of education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): ISRCTN96595458 (archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6RlyhYTYK). Application date: 10 July 2011. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4753651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47536512016-02-16 Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival Huber, Daniel Henriksson, Robin Jakobsson, Stina Stenfors, Nikolai Mooe, Thomas Trials Research BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility study of a telephone-based secondary preventive programme in an unselected ACS cohort. METHODS: The NAILED (Nurse-based Age-independent Intervention to Limit Evolution of Disease) ACS trial is a prospective randomized controlled trial. All eligible patients admitted for ACS were randomized to usual follow-up by a general practitioner or telephone follow-up by study nurses. The intervention was made by continuous telephone contact, with counseling on healthy living and titration of medicines to reach target values for blood pressure and blood lipids. Exclusion criteria were limited to physical inability to follow the study design or participation in another study. RESULTS: A total of 907 patients were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 661 (72.9 %) were included and randomized, 100 (11 %) declined participation, and 146 (16.1 %) were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were participation in another trial, dementia, and advanced disease. “Excluded” and “declining” patients were significantly older with more co-morbidity, decreased functional status, and had more seldom received education above compulsory school level than “included” patients. Non-participants had a higher 1-year mortality than participants. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up after ACS can be applied to a large proportion in an unselected clinical setting. Reasons for non-participation, which were associated with increased mortality, include older age, multiple co-morbidities, decreased functional status and low level of education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): ISRCTN96595458 (archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6RlyhYTYK). Application date: 10 July 2011. BioMed Central 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4753651/ /pubmed/26876722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x Text en © Huber et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Huber, Daniel Henriksson, Robin Jakobsson, Stina Stenfors, Nikolai Mooe, Thomas Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title | Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title_full | Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title_short | Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
title_sort | implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (acs): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huberdaniel implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival AT henrikssonrobin implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival AT jakobssonstina implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival AT stenforsnikolai implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival AT mooethomas implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival |