Cargando…

Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber, Daniel, Henriksson, Robin, Jakobsson, Stina, Stenfors, Nikolai, Mooe, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x
_version_ 1782415892381958144
author Huber, Daniel
Henriksson, Robin
Jakobsson, Stina
Stenfors, Nikolai
Mooe, Thomas
author_facet Huber, Daniel
Henriksson, Robin
Jakobsson, Stina
Stenfors, Nikolai
Mooe, Thomas
author_sort Huber, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility study of a telephone-based secondary preventive programme in an unselected ACS cohort. METHODS: The NAILED (Nurse-based Age-independent Intervention to Limit Evolution of Disease) ACS trial is a prospective randomized controlled trial. All eligible patients admitted for ACS were randomized to usual follow-up by a general practitioner or telephone follow-up by study nurses. The intervention was made by continuous telephone contact, with counseling on healthy living and titration of medicines to reach target values for blood pressure and blood lipids. Exclusion criteria were limited to physical inability to follow the study design or participation in another study. RESULTS: A total of 907 patients were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 661 (72.9 %) were included and randomized, 100 (11 %) declined participation, and 146 (16.1 %) were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were participation in another trial, dementia, and advanced disease. “Excluded” and “declining” patients were significantly older with more co-morbidity, decreased functional status, and had more seldom received education above compulsory school level than “included” patients. Non-participants had a higher 1-year mortality than participants. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up after ACS can be applied to a large proportion in an unselected clinical setting. Reasons for non-participation, which were associated with increased mortality, include older age, multiple co-morbidities, decreased functional status and low level of education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): ISRCTN96595458 (archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6RlyhYTYK). Application date: 10 July 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4753651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47536512016-02-16 Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival Huber, Daniel Henriksson, Robin Jakobsson, Stina Stenfors, Nikolai Mooe, Thomas Trials Research BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of death from a non-communicable disease. Secondary prevention is effective for reducing morbidity and mortality, but evidence-based targets are seldom reached and new interventional methods are needed. The present study is a feasibility study of a telephone-based secondary preventive programme in an unselected ACS cohort. METHODS: The NAILED (Nurse-based Age-independent Intervention to Limit Evolution of Disease) ACS trial is a prospective randomized controlled trial. All eligible patients admitted for ACS were randomized to usual follow-up by a general practitioner or telephone follow-up by study nurses. The intervention was made by continuous telephone contact, with counseling on healthy living and titration of medicines to reach target values for blood pressure and blood lipids. Exclusion criteria were limited to physical inability to follow the study design or participation in another study. RESULTS: A total of 907 patients were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 661 (72.9 %) were included and randomized, 100 (11 %) declined participation, and 146 (16.1 %) were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were participation in another trial, dementia, and advanced disease. “Excluded” and “declining” patients were significantly older with more co-morbidity, decreased functional status, and had more seldom received education above compulsory school level than “included” patients. Non-participants had a higher 1-year mortality than participants. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led telephone-based follow-up after ACS can be applied to a large proportion in an unselected clinical setting. Reasons for non-participation, which were associated with increased mortality, include older age, multiple co-morbidities, decreased functional status and low level of education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): ISRCTN96595458 (archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6RlyhYTYK). Application date: 10 July 2011. BioMed Central 2016-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4753651/ /pubmed/26876722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x Text en © Huber et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Huber, Daniel
Henriksson, Robin
Jakobsson, Stina
Stenfors, Nikolai
Mooe, Thomas
Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title_full Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title_fullStr Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title_short Implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
title_sort implementation of a telephone-based secondary preventive intervention after acute coronary syndrome (acs): participation rate, reasons for non-participation and 1-year survival
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4753651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1203-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huberdaniel implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival
AT henrikssonrobin implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival
AT jakobssonstina implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival
AT stenforsnikolai implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival
AT mooethomas implementationofatelephonebasedsecondarypreventiveinterventionafteracutecoronarysyndromeacsparticipationratereasonsfornonparticipationand1yearsurvival