Cargando…

Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hiatal hernia is a common condition often associated with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) with biologic mesh to reduce and/or alleviate GERD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Craig G., Thackeray, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26884676
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00104
_version_ 1782415973732581376
author Chang, Craig G.
Thackeray, Lisa
author_facet Chang, Craig G.
Thackeray, Lisa
author_sort Chang, Craig G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hiatal hernia is a common condition often associated with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) with biologic mesh to reduce and/or alleviate GERD symptoms and associated hiatal hernia recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive LHHR procedures with biologic mesh performed by a single surgeon from July 2009 to October 2014. The primary efficacy outcome measures were relief from GERD symptoms, as measured according to the GERD–health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scale and hiatal hernia recurrence. A secondary outcome measure was overall safety of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients underwent LHHR with biologic mesh during the study period, and pre- and postoperative GERD-HRQL studies were available for 172 of them. At baseline (preoperative), the mean GERD-HRQL score for all procedures was 18.5 ± 14.4. At follow-up (mean, 14.5 ± 11.0 months [range, 2.0–56.0]), the score showed a statistically significant decline to a mean of 4.4 ± 7.5 (P < .0001). To date, 8 patients (3.6%, 8/221) have had a documented anatomic hiatal hernia recurrence. However, a secondary hiatal hernia repair reoperation was necessary in only 1 patient. Most complications were minor (dysphagia, nausea and vomiting). However, there was 1 death caused by a hemorrhage that occurred 1 week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using biologic mesh, both with and without a simultaneous bariatric or antireflux procedure, is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option for management of hiatal hernia, prevention of recurrence, and relief of symptomatic GERD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4754198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47541982016-02-16 Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience Chang, Craig G. Thackeray, Lisa JSLS Scientific Paper BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hiatal hernia is a common condition often associated with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) with biologic mesh to reduce and/or alleviate GERD symptoms and associated hiatal hernia recurrence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive LHHR procedures with biologic mesh performed by a single surgeon from July 2009 to October 2014. The primary efficacy outcome measures were relief from GERD symptoms, as measured according to the GERD–health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scale and hiatal hernia recurrence. A secondary outcome measure was overall safety of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients underwent LHHR with biologic mesh during the study period, and pre- and postoperative GERD-HRQL studies were available for 172 of them. At baseline (preoperative), the mean GERD-HRQL score for all procedures was 18.5 ± 14.4. At follow-up (mean, 14.5 ± 11.0 months [range, 2.0–56.0]), the score showed a statistically significant decline to a mean of 4.4 ± 7.5 (P < .0001). To date, 8 patients (3.6%, 8/221) have had a documented anatomic hiatal hernia recurrence. However, a secondary hiatal hernia repair reoperation was necessary in only 1 patient. Most complications were minor (dysphagia, nausea and vomiting). However, there was 1 death caused by a hemorrhage that occurred 1 week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using biologic mesh, both with and without a simultaneous bariatric or antireflux procedure, is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option for management of hiatal hernia, prevention of recurrence, and relief of symptomatic GERD. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4754198/ /pubmed/26884676 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00104 Text en © 2016 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Paper
Chang, Craig G.
Thackeray, Lisa
Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title_full Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title_short Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience
title_sort laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in 221 patients: outcomes and experience
topic Scientific Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26884676
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00104
work_keys_str_mv AT changcraigg laparoscopichiatalherniarepairin221patientsoutcomesandexperience
AT thackeraylisa laparoscopichiatalherniarepairin221patientsoutcomesandexperience