Cargando…

Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research

Modern health care provision is now fundamentally evidence based, meaning competency in academic medicine is integral to medical training. The Integrated Academic Training pathway provides focussed training in this area at a postgraduate level but no such provision exists at an undergraduate level....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connor, Stuart, Clarke, Alexander Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26781094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0239-z
_version_ 1782415977066004480
author O’Connor, Stuart
Clarke, Alexander Kenneth
author_facet O’Connor, Stuart
Clarke, Alexander Kenneth
author_sort O’Connor, Stuart
collection PubMed
description Modern health care provision is now fundamentally evidence based, meaning competency in academic medicine is integral to medical training. The Integrated Academic Training pathway provides focussed training in this area at a postgraduate level but no such provision exists at an undergraduate level. A number of peer-led academic societies have emerged across the UK to provide education and support for undergraduates but there is little evidence about the type of peer-led interventions that are effective. We report here the findings of one such peer-led organization, the Warwick Academic Medicine Society. We found that traditional educational interventions, including didactic lectures and small-group teaching, are effective at inspiring students regarding academic medicine but poor at translating this enthusiasm into sustained involvement in research. We find this disparity to be centred on misconceptions amongst students regarding the time and skills required to meaningfully contribute to a research project. Further, we introduce the concept of the Live Research Demonstration (LRD), a novel peer-led educational intervention which aims to address these misconceptions and improve involvement of students in research. Initial pilots of the LRD concept have shown significant promise and we recommend a larger trial across multiple localities to confirm its educational benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4754219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47542192016-02-24 Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research O’Connor, Stuart Clarke, Alexander Kenneth Perspect Med Educ Show and Tell Modern health care provision is now fundamentally evidence based, meaning competency in academic medicine is integral to medical training. The Integrated Academic Training pathway provides focussed training in this area at a postgraduate level but no such provision exists at an undergraduate level. A number of peer-led academic societies have emerged across the UK to provide education and support for undergraduates but there is little evidence about the type of peer-led interventions that are effective. We report here the findings of one such peer-led organization, the Warwick Academic Medicine Society. We found that traditional educational interventions, including didactic lectures and small-group teaching, are effective at inspiring students regarding academic medicine but poor at translating this enthusiasm into sustained involvement in research. We find this disparity to be centred on misconceptions amongst students regarding the time and skills required to meaningfully contribute to a research project. Further, we introduce the concept of the Live Research Demonstration (LRD), a novel peer-led educational intervention which aims to address these misconceptions and improve involvement of students in research. Initial pilots of the LRD concept have shown significant promise and we recommend a larger trial across multiple localities to confirm its educational benefits. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2016-01-18 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4754219/ /pubmed/26781094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0239-z Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Show and Tell
O’Connor, Stuart
Clarke, Alexander Kenneth
Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title_full Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title_fullStr Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title_full_unstemmed Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title_short Peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
title_sort peer-led live research demonstrations: challenging medical student misconceptions about research
topic Show and Tell
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26781094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0239-z
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorstuart peerledliveresearchdemonstrationschallengingmedicalstudentmisconceptionsaboutresearch
AT clarkealexanderkenneth peerledliveresearchdemonstrationschallengingmedicalstudentmisconceptionsaboutresearch