Cargando…

Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA

BACKGROUND: The manual Generation II (Gen II) ELISA method used to measure Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) from Beckman Coulter has recently been superseded by a fully automated AMH immunoassay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Access AMH assay and directly compare it to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Kylie, Long, Matthew, Prasad, Josephine, Wu, Ye Ying, Bonifacio, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0143-3
_version_ 1782416123045609472
author Pearson, Kylie
Long, Matthew
Prasad, Josephine
Wu, Ye Ying
Bonifacio, Michael
author_facet Pearson, Kylie
Long, Matthew
Prasad, Josephine
Wu, Ye Ying
Bonifacio, Michael
author_sort Pearson, Kylie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The manual Generation II (Gen II) ELISA method used to measure Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) from Beckman Coulter has recently been superseded by a fully automated AMH immunoassay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Access AMH assay and directly compare it to the modified Gen II ELISA method. A secondary aim was to verify that the fertile age-related AMH range previously established using the Gen II ELISA could be used to interpret results from the new automated Access assay. METHODS: The precision, stability, linearity, measurement range and detection limits were determined using recombinant AMH and patient serum samples. Different diluents and their effects on AMH concentration were compared. A correlation study was performed on patient samples to compare the Access AMH assay to the ELISA method on the Access2 and DxI800 analysers. The fertile AMH range was verified by comparing the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile values from both methods obtained from 489 natural conception pregnant women. RESULTS: The Access AMH assay showed good performance across the measuring range for both intra-assay (CV 1.41–3.30 %) and inter-assay (CV 3.04–5.76 %) precision and acceptable sample stability. Dilution of the high concentration samples with the recommended diluent resulted in a small but significant downward shift in values. The assay was linear over the range of values recommended by the manufacturer, allowing for accurate reporting within the reported range. The two assay types were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.9822 and 0.9832 for Access2 and DxI800, respectively), and the differences observed between the Access2 and DxI800 analysers were within clinically acceptable ranges, indicating that the methods are interchangeable. Furthermore, we demonstrated that results from the published reference range for the Gen II ELISA correlate with those from the automated Access AMH assay. CONCLUSION: Here, we verified the published performance of the Access AMH assay and showed excellent correlation with the Gen II ELISA method. Moreover, we validated this correlation by confirming that the results from a fertile AMH reference range established using the preceding Gen II ELISA are interchangeable with the new automated Access AMH assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-016-0143-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4754992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47549922016-02-17 Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA Pearson, Kylie Long, Matthew Prasad, Josephine Wu, Ye Ying Bonifacio, Michael Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The manual Generation II (Gen II) ELISA method used to measure Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) from Beckman Coulter has recently been superseded by a fully automated AMH immunoassay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Access AMH assay and directly compare it to the modified Gen II ELISA method. A secondary aim was to verify that the fertile age-related AMH range previously established using the Gen II ELISA could be used to interpret results from the new automated Access assay. METHODS: The precision, stability, linearity, measurement range and detection limits were determined using recombinant AMH and patient serum samples. Different diluents and their effects on AMH concentration were compared. A correlation study was performed on patient samples to compare the Access AMH assay to the ELISA method on the Access2 and DxI800 analysers. The fertile AMH range was verified by comparing the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile values from both methods obtained from 489 natural conception pregnant women. RESULTS: The Access AMH assay showed good performance across the measuring range for both intra-assay (CV 1.41–3.30 %) and inter-assay (CV 3.04–5.76 %) precision and acceptable sample stability. Dilution of the high concentration samples with the recommended diluent resulted in a small but significant downward shift in values. The assay was linear over the range of values recommended by the manufacturer, allowing for accurate reporting within the reported range. The two assay types were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.9822 and 0.9832 for Access2 and DxI800, respectively), and the differences observed between the Access2 and DxI800 analysers were within clinically acceptable ranges, indicating that the methods are interchangeable. Furthermore, we demonstrated that results from the published reference range for the Gen II ELISA correlate with those from the automated Access AMH assay. CONCLUSION: Here, we verified the published performance of the Access AMH assay and showed excellent correlation with the Gen II ELISA method. Moreover, we validated this correlation by confirming that the results from a fertile AMH reference range established using the preceding Gen II ELISA are interchangeable with the new automated Access AMH assay. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12958-016-0143-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4754992/ /pubmed/26879773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0143-3 Text en © Pearson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pearson, Kylie
Long, Matthew
Prasad, Josephine
Wu, Ye Ying
Bonifacio, Michael
Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title_full Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title_fullStr Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title_short Assessment of the Access AMH assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the AMH Generation II manual ELISA
title_sort assessment of the access amh assay as an automated, high-performance replacement for the amh generation ii manual elisa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4754992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26879773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0143-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonkylie assessmentoftheaccessamhassayasanautomatedhighperformancereplacementfortheamhgenerationiimanualelisa
AT longmatthew assessmentoftheaccessamhassayasanautomatedhighperformancereplacementfortheamhgenerationiimanualelisa
AT prasadjosephine assessmentoftheaccessamhassayasanautomatedhighperformancereplacementfortheamhgenerationiimanualelisa
AT wuyeying assessmentoftheaccessamhassayasanautomatedhighperformancereplacementfortheamhgenerationiimanualelisa
AT bonifaciomichael assessmentoftheaccessamhassayasanautomatedhighperformancereplacementfortheamhgenerationiimanualelisa