Cargando…

EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS

BACKGROUND: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa, YAMAKI, Vitor Nagai, PONTES, Ruy Victor Simões, BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques, da SILVA, José Antonio Cordero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-6720201500040007
_version_ 1782416159389253632
author TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa
YAMAKI, Vitor Nagai
PONTES, Ruy Victor Simões
BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques
da SILVA, José Antonio Cordero
author_facet TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa
YAMAKI, Vitor Nagai
PONTES, Ruy Victor Simões
BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques
da SILVA, José Antonio Cordero
author_sort TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. AIM: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals METHOD: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. RESULTS: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4755175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47551752016-02-24 EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa YAMAKI, Vitor Nagai PONTES, Ruy Victor Simões BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques da SILVA, José Antonio Cordero Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. AIM: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals METHOD: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. RESULTS: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4755175/ /pubmed/26734793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-6720201500040007 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
TEIXEIRA, Renan Kleber Costa
YAMAKI, Vitor Nagai
PONTES, Ruy Victor Simões
BRITO, Marcus Vinicius Henriques
da SILVA, José Antonio Cordero
EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title_full EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title_short EVALUATION OF ETHICAL IN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS OF BRAZILIAN SURGICAL JOURNALS
title_sort evaluation of ethical in instructions to authors of brazilian surgical journals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-6720201500040007
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeirarenanklebercosta evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals
AT yamakivitornagai evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals
AT pontesruyvictorsimoes evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals
AT britomarcusviniciushenriques evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals
AT dasilvajoseantoniocordero evaluationofethicalininstructionstoauthorsofbraziliansurgicaljournals