Cargando…

A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, administering noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) is considered as the building block for the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Since nasal continuous PAP (n-CPAP) established its roots as an interventional approach to treat RDS, there have always been c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghnia, Alireza, Danaei, Navid, Barkatein, Behzad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.173930
_version_ 1782416169243770880
author Sadeghnia, Alireza
Danaei, Navid
Barkatein, Behzad
author_facet Sadeghnia, Alireza
Danaei, Navid
Barkatein, Behzad
author_sort Sadeghnia, Alireza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nowadays, administering noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) is considered as the building block for the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Since nasal continuous PAP (n-CPAP) established its roots as an interventional approach to treat RDS, there have always been concerns related to the increased work of breathing in newborns treated with this intervention. Therefore, respiratory support systems such as nasal bi-level PAP (N-BiPAP) and sigh-PAP (SiPAP) have been developed during the last decade. In this study, two respiratory support systems which, unlike n-CPAP, are categorized as cycled noninvasive ventilation, are studied. METHODS: This study was a randomized clinical trial done on 74 newborns weighing 1500 g or less affiliated with RDS hospitalized in NICU at Al-Zahra Hospital from October 2012 to March 2014. Patients were randomly assigned to two respiratory support groups of N-BiPAP and SiPAP. Each group contained 37 newborns who were compared, according to their demographic characteristics, duration of noninvasive ventilation, the need to administer surfactant, apnea incidence, the need for mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), the duration of oxygen supplement administration, and chronic lung disease (CLD). RESULTS: The average duration of noninvasive respiratory support, and the average duration of the need for oxygen supplement had no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, apnea incidence, the need for mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, IVH, PDA, CLD, the need for the second dose of surfactant, and the death rate showed no significant difference in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SiPAP showed no significant clinical preference over N-BiPAP in the treatment of the newborns with RDS weighing <1500 g.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4755220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47552202016-03-03 A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome Sadeghnia, Alireza Danaei, Navid Barkatein, Behzad Int J Prev Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Nowadays, administering noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) is considered as the building block for the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Since nasal continuous PAP (n-CPAP) established its roots as an interventional approach to treat RDS, there have always been concerns related to the increased work of breathing in newborns treated with this intervention. Therefore, respiratory support systems such as nasal bi-level PAP (N-BiPAP) and sigh-PAP (SiPAP) have been developed during the last decade. In this study, two respiratory support systems which, unlike n-CPAP, are categorized as cycled noninvasive ventilation, are studied. METHODS: This study was a randomized clinical trial done on 74 newborns weighing 1500 g or less affiliated with RDS hospitalized in NICU at Al-Zahra Hospital from October 2012 to March 2014. Patients were randomly assigned to two respiratory support groups of N-BiPAP and SiPAP. Each group contained 37 newborns who were compared, according to their demographic characteristics, duration of noninvasive ventilation, the need to administer surfactant, apnea incidence, the need for mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), the duration of oxygen supplement administration, and chronic lung disease (CLD). RESULTS: The average duration of noninvasive respiratory support, and the average duration of the need for oxygen supplement had no significant difference between the groups. Moreover, apnea incidence, the need for mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax, IVH, PDA, CLD, the need for the second dose of surfactant, and the death rate showed no significant difference in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SiPAP showed no significant clinical preference over N-BiPAP in the treatment of the newborns with RDS weighing <1500 g. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4755220/ /pubmed/26941922 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.173930 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Sadeghnia A. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadeghnia, Alireza
Danaei, Navid
Barkatein, Behzad
A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_short A Comparison of the Effect of Nasal bi-level Positive Airway Pressure and Sigh-positive Airway Pressure on the Treatment of the Preterm Newborns Weighing Less than 1500 g Affiliated with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
title_sort comparison of the effect of nasal bi-level positive airway pressure and sigh-positive airway pressure on the treatment of the preterm newborns weighing less than 1500 g affiliated with respiratory distress syndrome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26941922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-7802.173930
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghniaalireza acomparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT danaeinavid acomparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT barkateinbehzad acomparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT sadeghniaalireza comparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT danaeinavid comparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT barkateinbehzad comparisonoftheeffectofnasalbilevelpositiveairwaypressureandsighpositiveairwaypressureonthetreatmentofthepretermnewbornsweighinglessthan1500gaffiliatedwithrespiratorydistresssyndrome