Cargando…
Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates
Most perceptual decisions require comparisons between current input and an internal template. Classic studies propose that templates are encoded in sustained activity of sensory neurons. However, stimulus encoding is itself dynamic, tracing a complex trajectory through activity space. Which part of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26653854 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000 |
_version_ | 1782416230210076672 |
---|---|
author | Myers, Nicholas E Rohenkohl, Gustavo Wyart, Valentin Woolrich, Mark W Nobre, Anna C Stokes, Mark G |
author_facet | Myers, Nicholas E Rohenkohl, Gustavo Wyart, Valentin Woolrich, Mark W Nobre, Anna C Stokes, Mark G |
author_sort | Myers, Nicholas E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most perceptual decisions require comparisons between current input and an internal template. Classic studies propose that templates are encoded in sustained activity of sensory neurons. However, stimulus encoding is itself dynamic, tracing a complex trajectory through activity space. Which part of this trajectory is pre-activated to reflect the template? Here we recorded magneto- and electroencephalography during a visual target-detection task, and used pattern analyses to decode template, stimulus, and decision-variable representation. Our findings ran counter to the dominant model of sustained pre-activation. Instead, template information emerged transiently around stimulus onset and quickly subsided. Cross-generalization between stimulus and template coding, indicating a shared neural representation, occurred only briefly. Our results are compatible with the proposal that template representation relies on a matched filter, transforming input into task-appropriate output. This proposal was consistent with a signed difference response at the perceptual decision stage, which can be explained by a simple neural model. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000.001 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4755744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47557442016-02-18 Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates Myers, Nicholas E Rohenkohl, Gustavo Wyart, Valentin Woolrich, Mark W Nobre, Anna C Stokes, Mark G eLife Neuroscience Most perceptual decisions require comparisons between current input and an internal template. Classic studies propose that templates are encoded in sustained activity of sensory neurons. However, stimulus encoding is itself dynamic, tracing a complex trajectory through activity space. Which part of this trajectory is pre-activated to reflect the template? Here we recorded magneto- and electroencephalography during a visual target-detection task, and used pattern analyses to decode template, stimulus, and decision-variable representation. Our findings ran counter to the dominant model of sustained pre-activation. Instead, template information emerged transiently around stimulus onset and quickly subsided. Cross-generalization between stimulus and template coding, indicating a shared neural representation, occurred only briefly. Our results are compatible with the proposal that template representation relies on a matched filter, transforming input into task-appropriate output. This proposal was consistent with a signed difference response at the perceptual decision stage, which can be explained by a simple neural model. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000.001 eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4755744/ /pubmed/26653854 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000 Text en © 2015, Myers et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Myers, Nicholas E Rohenkohl, Gustavo Wyart, Valentin Woolrich, Mark W Nobre, Anna C Stokes, Mark G Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title | Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title_full | Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title_fullStr | Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title_short | Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
title_sort | testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4755744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26653854 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myersnicholase testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates AT rohenkohlgustavo testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates AT wyartvalentin testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates AT woolrichmarkw testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates AT nobreannac testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates AT stokesmarkg testingsensoryevidenceagainstmnemonictemplates |