Cargando…

Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients

[Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Chang Gu, Chun, Min Ho, Chang, Min Cheol, Kim, Won, Hee Do, Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202
_version_ 1782416249904431104
author Kang, Chang Gu
Chun, Min Ho
Chang, Min Cheol
Kim, Won
Hee Do, Kyung
author_facet Kang, Chang Gu
Chun, Min Ho
Chang, Min Cheol
Kim, Won
Hee Do, Kyung
author_sort Kang, Chang Gu
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physical therapists from 38 hospitals participated in our questionnaire survey. [Results] The most common answers about the merits of gait-training robots concern improving the treatment effects (28.5%), followed by standardizing treatment (19%), motivating patients about treatment (17%), and improving patients’ self-esteem (14%). The subacute period (1–3 months post-stroke onset) was most often chosen as the ideal period (47.3%) for the use of these devices, and a functional ambulation classification of 0–2 was the most selected response for the optimal patient status (27%). The preferred model was the treadmill type (47.5%) over the overground walking type (40%). The most favored commercial price was $50,000–$100,000 (38.3%). The most selected optimal duration for robot-assisted gait therapy was 30–45 min (47%), followed by 15–30 min (29%), 45–60 min (18%), ≥ 60 min (5%), and < 15 min (1%). [Conclusion] Our study findings could guide the future designs of more effective gait-training robots for stroke patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47560042016-03-08 Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients Kang, Chang Gu Chun, Min Ho Chang, Min Cheol Kim, Won Hee Do, Kyung J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physical therapists from 38 hospitals participated in our questionnaire survey. [Results] The most common answers about the merits of gait-training robots concern improving the treatment effects (28.5%), followed by standardizing treatment (19%), motivating patients about treatment (17%), and improving patients’ self-esteem (14%). The subacute period (1–3 months post-stroke onset) was most often chosen as the ideal period (47.3%) for the use of these devices, and a functional ambulation classification of 0–2 was the most selected response for the optimal patient status (27%). The preferred model was the treadmill type (47.5%) over the overground walking type (40%). The most favored commercial price was $50,000–$100,000 (38.3%). The most selected optimal duration for robot-assisted gait therapy was 30–45 min (47%), followed by 15–30 min (29%), 45–60 min (18%), ≥ 60 min (5%), and < 15 min (1%). [Conclusion] Our study findings could guide the future designs of more effective gait-training robots for stroke patients. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-01-30 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4756004/ /pubmed/26957758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kang, Chang Gu
Chun, Min Ho
Chang, Min Cheol
Kim, Won
Hee Do, Kyung
Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title_full Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title_fullStr Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title_short Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
title_sort views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202
work_keys_str_mv AT kangchanggu viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients
AT chunminho viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients
AT changmincheol viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients
AT kimwon viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients
AT heedokyung viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients