Cargando…
Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients
[Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202 |
_version_ | 1782416249904431104 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Chang Gu Chun, Min Ho Chang, Min Cheol Kim, Won Hee Do, Kyung |
author_facet | Kang, Chang Gu Chun, Min Ho Chang, Min Cheol Kim, Won Hee Do, Kyung |
author_sort | Kang, Chang Gu |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physical therapists from 38 hospitals participated in our questionnaire survey. [Results] The most common answers about the merits of gait-training robots concern improving the treatment effects (28.5%), followed by standardizing treatment (19%), motivating patients about treatment (17%), and improving patients’ self-esteem (14%). The subacute period (1–3 months post-stroke onset) was most often chosen as the ideal period (47.3%) for the use of these devices, and a functional ambulation classification of 0–2 was the most selected response for the optimal patient status (27%). The preferred model was the treadmill type (47.5%) over the overground walking type (40%). The most favored commercial price was $50,000–$100,000 (38.3%). The most selected optimal duration for robot-assisted gait therapy was 30–45 min (47%), followed by 15–30 min (29%), 45–60 min (18%), ≥ 60 min (5%), and < 15 min (1%). [Conclusion] Our study findings could guide the future designs of more effective gait-training robots for stroke patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4756004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47560042016-03-08 Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients Kang, Chang Gu Chun, Min Ho Chang, Min Cheol Kim, Won Hee Do, Kyung J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Gait-training robots have been developed for stroke patients with gait disturbance. It is important to survey the views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the characteristics of these devices during their development. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 100 physiatrists and 100 physical therapists from 38 hospitals participated in our questionnaire survey. [Results] The most common answers about the merits of gait-training robots concern improving the treatment effects (28.5%), followed by standardizing treatment (19%), motivating patients about treatment (17%), and improving patients’ self-esteem (14%). The subacute period (1–3 months post-stroke onset) was most often chosen as the ideal period (47.3%) for the use of these devices, and a functional ambulation classification of 0–2 was the most selected response for the optimal patient status (27%). The preferred model was the treadmill type (47.5%) over the overground walking type (40%). The most favored commercial price was $50,000–$100,000 (38.3%). The most selected optimal duration for robot-assisted gait therapy was 30–45 min (47%), followed by 15–30 min (29%), 45–60 min (18%), ≥ 60 min (5%), and < 15 min (1%). [Conclusion] Our study findings could guide the future designs of more effective gait-training robots for stroke patients. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-01-30 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4756004/ /pubmed/26957758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kang, Chang Gu Chun, Min Ho Chang, Min Cheol Kim, Won Hee Do, Kyung Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training robots for stroke patients |
title | Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
title_full | Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
title_fullStr | Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
title_short | Views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
title_sort | views of physiatrists and physical therapists on the use of gait-training
robots for stroke patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26957758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangchanggu viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients AT chunminho viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients AT changmincheol viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients AT kimwon viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients AT heedokyung viewsofphysiatristsandphysicaltherapistsontheuseofgaittrainingrobotsforstrokepatients |