Cargando…

Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND: Local treatments to alleviate symptoms in hand osteoarthritis (OA) are preferred, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. Therefore, we have summarized the benefits and harms of intra-articular (IA) therapies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review until May 2015...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kroon, Féline P. B., Rubio, Roxana, Schoones, Jan W., Kloppenburg, Margreet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0330-5
_version_ 1782416259995926528
author Kroon, Féline P. B.
Rubio, Roxana
Schoones, Jan W.
Kloppenburg, Margreet
author_facet Kroon, Féline P. B.
Rubio, Roxana
Schoones, Jan W.
Kloppenburg, Margreet
author_sort Kroon, Féline P. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Local treatments to alleviate symptoms in hand osteoarthritis (OA) are preferred, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. Therefore, we have summarized the benefits and harms of intra-articular (IA) therapies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review until May 2015, including all controlled trials investigating efficacy or safety of any IA therapy in carpometacarpal (CMC) and interphalangeal (IP) OA compared with placebo or other treatments. Two authors independently selected trials and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The main efficacy outcome was pain. We performed meta-analysis where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 13 trials (864 patients) studying CMC (n = 11) and IP OA (n = 2) were included, comparing corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid (HA) versus placebo (n = 4 and n = 3), and corticosteroids versus HA (n = 6). Single studies investigated infliximab, dextrose, and different HAs. The overall risk of bias was unclear or high in most trials. Meta-analysis of two trials comparing corticosteroids with placebo in CMC OA showed no improvement in pain [mean difference −3.56, 95 % confidence interval (CI) −13.87 to 6.75, scale 0–100). HA also appeared not efficacious compared with placebo in CMC OA. One trial comparing corticosteroids with placebo in IP OA demonstrated significantly improved pain during movement. No convincing evidence for efficacy of corticosteroids or HA over the other or alternative therapies was found. Only local adverse events were reported. No specific IA therapy appeared more harmful than another. CONCLUSION: Despite a beneficial short-term safety profile, IA corticosteroids or HA do not appear more effective than placebo in CMC OA. The suggestion that IA corticosteroids might be efficacious in IP OA requires confirmation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-015-0330-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4756050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47560502016-02-26 Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review Kroon, Féline P. B. Rubio, Roxana Schoones, Jan W. Kloppenburg, Margreet Drugs Aging Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Local treatments to alleviate symptoms in hand osteoarthritis (OA) are preferred, especially in elderly patients with comorbidities. Therefore, we have summarized the benefits and harms of intra-articular (IA) therapies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review until May 2015, including all controlled trials investigating efficacy or safety of any IA therapy in carpometacarpal (CMC) and interphalangeal (IP) OA compared with placebo or other treatments. Two authors independently selected trials and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The main efficacy outcome was pain. We performed meta-analysis where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 13 trials (864 patients) studying CMC (n = 11) and IP OA (n = 2) were included, comparing corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid (HA) versus placebo (n = 4 and n = 3), and corticosteroids versus HA (n = 6). Single studies investigated infliximab, dextrose, and different HAs. The overall risk of bias was unclear or high in most trials. Meta-analysis of two trials comparing corticosteroids with placebo in CMC OA showed no improvement in pain [mean difference −3.56, 95 % confidence interval (CI) −13.87 to 6.75, scale 0–100). HA also appeared not efficacious compared with placebo in CMC OA. One trial comparing corticosteroids with placebo in IP OA demonstrated significantly improved pain during movement. No convincing evidence for efficacy of corticosteroids or HA over the other or alternative therapies was found. Only local adverse events were reported. No specific IA therapy appeared more harmful than another. CONCLUSION: Despite a beneficial short-term safety profile, IA corticosteroids or HA do not appear more effective than placebo in CMC OA. The suggestion that IA corticosteroids might be efficacious in IP OA requires confirmation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-015-0330-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2015-12-09 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4756050/ /pubmed/26650235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0330-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kroon, Féline P. B.
Rubio, Roxana
Schoones, Jan W.
Kloppenburg, Margreet
Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Intra-Articular Therapies in the Treatment of Hand Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort intra-articular therapies in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26650235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0330-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kroonfelinepb intraarticulartherapiesinthetreatmentofhandosteoarthritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT rubioroxana intraarticulartherapiesinthetreatmentofhandosteoarthritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT schoonesjanw intraarticulartherapiesinthetreatmentofhandosteoarthritisasystematicliteraturereview
AT kloppenburgmargreet intraarticulartherapiesinthetreatmentofhandosteoarthritisasystematicliteraturereview